Jonathan Bright
Impact in
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
-
- Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
- Gut microbiota and health
Papers in
-
- Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies 5
-
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 3
- Molecular spectroscopy and chirality 1
- Co-authors
- Eva M. Lenz (5 shared papers)Ian D. Wilson (5 shared papers)Richard Knight (3 shared papers)Hilary Major (3 shared papers)Shethah Morgan (1 shared paper)Anthony Nash (1 shared paper)Henrik Lindberg (1 shared paper)Andrew Hughes (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis (3 papers)Biomarkers (1 paper)Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry (1 paper)European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (1 paper)Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Bright
13 papers receiving 836 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Spectroscopy 182
- Molecular Biology 655
- Clinical Biochemistry 64
- Pharmacology 75
- Complementary and alternative medicine 64
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Bright
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Bright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Bright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Bright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Bright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Bright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Bright. The network helps show where Jonathan Bright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Bright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 208 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 196 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 107 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 105 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 101 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 49 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 1 |
About Jonathan Bright
Jonathan Bright is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Physiology, Clinical Biochemistry and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 860 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (2 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (2 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (1 paper), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (1 paper) and Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (182 citations), Molecular Biology (655 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (64 citations), Pharmacology (75 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (64 citations). Jonathan Bright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Eva M. Lenz, Ian D. Wilson, Richard Knight, Hilary Major, Shethah Morgan, Anthony Nash, Henrik Lindberg, Andrew Hughes, D. T. DAVIES and F. Russell Westwood. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, Biomarkers, Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Alternatives to Laboratory Animals.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.