Philip Jarvis

2.2k citations
30 papers · 1.6k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 18
Topics
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (6 papers)Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers)Optimal Experimental Design Methods (4 papers)

In The Last Decade

Philip Jarvis

29 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Hit Papers

Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous ...19962026200620161996250500750

Peers

Philip Jarvis
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • Immunology 300
  • Statistics and Probability 247
  • Molecular Biology 179
  • Rheumatology 179
  • Dermatology 167
Replace Erica Brittain with:
Erica Brittain United States
Takashi Sozu Japan
Brian Calingaert United States
Ping Liu China
William D. Finkle United States
Francesc Cardellach Spain
Hyman Menduke United States
Kiyoshi Ichihara Japan
Peter E. Hickman Australia
John C. Hall Australia
Philip Jarvis relative to Erica Brittain United States Erica Brittain's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Erica Brittain · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Jarvis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Jarvis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Jarvis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Jarvis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Jarvis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Jarvis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Jarvis. The network helps show where Philip Jarvis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Jarvis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Jarvis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Jarvis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Jarvis. Philip Jarvis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 24
3 31
4 33
5 104
6 180
7 47
8 4
9 53
10 35
11 14
12 8
13 6
14 31
15 22
16 43
17 1
18 21
19 33
20
Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods: Fig 1breakdown →
757

About Philip Jarvis

Philip Jarvis is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Dermatology and Small Animals, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (6 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers) and Optimal Experimental Design Methods (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (247 citations), Dermatology (167 citations) and Immunology (300 citations). Philip Jarvis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Byron Jones, Alan Ebbutt, John A. Lewis, Frank Kolbinger, Mike Aylott, Christian Loesche, Thomas Peters, Claudio Calonder, Penelope J. Watt and Gerard Bruin. Their work appears in journals such as Biometrics, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and Statistics in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026