Jonathan Bright
- Communication top 1%
- Social Media and Politics 17
- Media Studies and Communication 5
- Health Informatics top 10%
-
- Misinformation and Its Impacts 8
- Media Influence and Politics 5
- Computer Science Applications top 10%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI 4
-
- E-Government and Public Services 9
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 5
-
- Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection 6
Jonathan Bright
63 papers receiving 890 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Communication 356
- Health Informatics 14
- Sociology and Political Science 406
- Computer Science Applications 46
- Safety Research 68
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Bright
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Bright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Bright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Bright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Bright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Bright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Bright. The network helps show where Jonathan Bright may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Bright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 119 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 14 | What Role Do 'Power Learners' Play in Online Learning Communities? | 2016 | 2 |
| 15 | The Real Component of Virtual Learning: Motivations for Face-to-Face MOOC Meetings in Developing and Industrialised Countries | 2015 | 3 |
| 16 | Ministerial Importance and Survival in Government. Tough at the Top | 2015 | 1 |
| 17 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 1 |
About Jonathan Bright
Jonathan Bright is a scholar working on Communication, Health Informatics, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 67 papers that have together received 958 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (17 papers), E-Government and Public Services (9 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (8 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (6 papers), Media Influence and Politics (5 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (5 papers), Media Studies and Communication (5 papers) and Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (356 citations), Health Informatics (14 citations), Sociology and Political Science (406 citations), Computer Science Applications (46 citations) and Safety Research (68 citations). Jonathan Bright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Bharath Ganesh, Helen Margetts, Tom Nicholls, Vili Lehdonvirta, John Gledhill, Monica Bulger, Cristóbal Cobo, Victoria Nash, Stefano De Sabbata and Conor Little. Their work appears in journals such as Policy & Internet, Journal of Communication, West European Politics, Information Communication & Society and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.