Jon Kaspersen

22 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers

Jon Kaspersen
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Computational Mechanics 129
  • Neurology 94
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 91
  • Environmental Engineering 59
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 89
Replace Thomas Redel with:
Thomas Redel Germany
Alberto Gambaruto United Kingdom
Erwan Kerrien France
Markus Fangerau Germany
György Paál Hungary
Daniele E. Schiavazzi United States
Mohamed Soufiane Jouini United Arab Emirates
Valérie Lacroix Belgium
Alireza Vali United States
J. A. Moore Canada
Jon Kaspersen relative to Thomas Redel Germany Thomas Redel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Thomas Redel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Kaspersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Kaspersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Kaspersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Kaspersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Kaspersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Kaspersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Kaspersen. The network helps show where Jon Kaspersen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jon Kaspersen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Kaspersen Line = papers co-authored together Jon Kaspersen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008140
2 199878
3 200348
4 200446
5 200342
6 200340
7 200827
8
[Accidental injection of adrenaline in a finger with EpiPen].
199819
9 200515
10 200115
11 201214
12 20098
13 20018
14 20053
15 20023
16 20013
17 20013
18
[Teleradiologic follow up of patients treated with aortic stent grafting].
20052
19 19932
20 20051

About Jon Kaspersen

Jon Kaspersen is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Computational Mechanics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 519 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wind and Air Flow Studies (5 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (4 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (4 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (3 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (2 papers) and Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (129 citations), Neurology (94 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (91 citations), Environmental Engineering (59 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (89 citations). Jon Kaspersen has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include P.-Å. Krogstad, Toril A. Nagelhus Hernes, Thomas Langø, Yuri Bazilevs, Bertil Romner, Knut Waterloo, Jørgen Isaksen, Tor Ingebrigtsen, Yongjie Zhang and Trond Kvamsdal. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, Physics of Fluids, Journal of Fluids Engineering and Journal of Endovascular Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact