Søren Peter Eiskjær

1.9k total citations
51 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Søren Peter Eiskjær is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Søren Peter Eiskjær has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Surgery, 17 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 7 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Søren Peter Eiskjær's work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (17 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (11 papers) and Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (10 papers). Søren Peter Eiskjær is often cited by papers focused on Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (17 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (11 papers) and Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (10 papers). Søren Peter Eiskjær collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, United States and Sweden. Søren Peter Eiskjær's co-authors include Finn Bjarke Christensen, Cody Bünger, Ebbe Stender Hansen, Karsten Thomsen, Søren Fruensgaard, Kristian Høy, Cody Bünger, John Gelineck, Malene Laursen and P. Neumann and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Spine.

In The Last Decade

Søren Peter Eiskjær

51 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Søren Peter Eiskjær Denmark 20 1.1k 827 413 192 167 51 1.4k
Javier Z. Guzman United States 24 1.1k 1.0× 661 0.8× 162 0.4× 141 0.7× 189 1.1× 67 1.5k
Charla R. Fischer United States 20 906 0.8× 533 0.6× 123 0.3× 131 0.7× 58 0.3× 76 1.1k
Miguel A. Pelton United States 13 759 0.7× 648 0.8× 133 0.3× 73 0.4× 80 0.5× 22 902
Anthony Frempong‐Boadu United States 21 1.3k 1.2× 771 0.9× 60 0.1× 40 0.2× 63 0.4× 64 1.5k
Jerry Y. Du United States 15 711 0.6× 420 0.5× 155 0.4× 80 0.4× 99 0.6× 75 850
Olivier Q. Groot United States 18 546 0.5× 206 0.2× 36 0.1× 233 1.2× 86 0.5× 81 879
Kevin J. McGuire United States 20 862 0.8× 448 0.5× 182 0.4× 60 0.3× 208 1.2× 47 1.2k
Daniel G. Tobert United States 19 696 0.6× 360 0.4× 88 0.2× 180 0.9× 69 0.4× 96 1.0k
Zoe B. Cheung United States 20 807 0.7× 435 0.5× 23 0.1× 115 0.6× 85 0.5× 52 1.0k
Hai Le United States 17 953 0.9× 522 0.6× 104 0.3× 72 0.4× 61 0.4× 63 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Søren Peter Eiskjær

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Søren Peter Eiskjær's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Søren Peter Eiskjær with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Søren Peter Eiskjær more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Søren Peter Eiskjær

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Søren Peter Eiskjær. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Søren Peter Eiskjær. The network helps show where Søren Peter Eiskjær may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Søren Peter Eiskjær

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Søren Peter Eiskjær. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Søren Peter Eiskjær based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Søren Peter Eiskjær. Søren Peter Eiskjær is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Andersen, Mikkel Østerheden, et al.. (2024). PROPOSE. Development and validation of a prediction model for shared decision making for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ). 17. 100309–100309. 6 indexed citations
3.
Diekhöner, Lars, et al.. (2023). The magnetic field strength and the force distance dependency of the magnetically controlled growing rods used for early onset scoliosis. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 3045–3045. 3 indexed citations
4.
Andersen, Mikkel Østerheden, et al.. (2022). Validating the predictive precision of the dialogue support tool on Danish patient cohorts. North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ). 13. 100188–100188. 1 indexed citations
5.
Tvedebrink, Torben, et al.. (2021). Comparison of interventions for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review with network meta-analysis. The Spine Journal. 21(10). 1750–1762. 24 indexed citations
6.
Ohrt‐Nissen, Søren, Kristian Høy, Martin Lindberg‐Larsen, et al.. (2021). Length of stay, readmission, and mortality after primary surgery for pediatric spinal deformities: a 10-year nationwide cohort study. The Spine Journal. 21(4). 653–663. 14 indexed citations
7.
Eiskjær, Søren Peter, et al.. (2021). Magnetically controlled growing rods in early-onset scoliosis.. PubMed. 69(4). 13 indexed citations
9.
Vergari, Claudio, et al.. (2019). A Nano-Dose Protocol For Cobb Angle Assessment in Children With Scoliosis: Results of a Phantom-based and Clinically Validated Study. Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication. 32(7). E340–E345. 4 indexed citations
11.
Eiskjær, Søren Peter, et al.. (2012). Dose optimisation for intraoperative cone-beam flat-detector CT in paediatric spinal surgery. Pediatric Radiology. 42(8). 965–973. 14 indexed citations
12.
Bünger, Cody, et al.. (2007). Circumferential Fusion Is Dominant Over Posterolateral Fusion in a Long-term Perspective. Spine. 32(22). 2405–2414. 57 indexed citations
13.
Christensen, Finn Bjarke, Ebbe Stender Hansen, Søren Peter Eiskjær, et al.. (2002). Circumferential Lumbar Spinal Fusion With Brantigan Cage Versus Posterolateral Fusion With Titanium Cotrel–Dubousset Instrumentation. Spine. 27(23). 2674–2683. 161 indexed citations
14.
Christensen, Finn Bjarke, Malene Laursen, John Gelineck, et al.. (2001). Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement of Radiograph Interpretation With and Without Pedicle Screw Implants. Spine. 26(5). 538–543. 98 indexed citations
15.
Jochumsen, Kirsten, et al.. (1999). [The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on posterolateral spinal fusion. A prospective, randomized study with a two-year follow-up].. PubMed. 161(13). 1920–5. 4 indexed citations
16.
Laursen, Malene, Karsten Thomsen, Søren Peter Eiskjær, E. Sommer Hansen, & Cody Bünger. (1999). Functional outcome after partial reduction and 360 degree fusion in grade III-V spondylolisthesis in adolescent and adult patients.. PubMed. 12(4). 300–6. 20 indexed citations
17.
Christensen, Finn Bjarke, et al.. (1998). Functional outcome after posterolateral spinal fusion using pedicle screws: comparison between primary and salvage procedure. European Spine Journal. 7(4). 321–327. 19 indexed citations
18.
Thomsen, Karsten, Finn Bjarke Christensen, Søren Peter Eiskjær, et al.. (1997). 1997 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies. Spine. 22(24). 2813–2822. 314 indexed citations
19.
Lassen, Michael R., Lars C. Borris, H M Christiansen, et al.. (1991). Prevention of thromboembolism in 190 hip arthroplasties: Comparison of LMW heparin andplacebo. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 62(1). 33–38. 108 indexed citations
20.
Eiskjær, Søren Peter, et al.. (1991). Risk Factors Influencing Mortality After Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in the Treatment of Fracture of the Femoral Neck. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 270(270). 295???300–295???300. 78 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026