Jon E. Anderson

57 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

The Use of Biological Assays to Evaluate Botanicals 1998 · 541 citations
5411998202620072016100200300400500

Peers

Jon E. Anderson
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Horticulture 288
  • Biochemistry 629
  • General Decision Sciences 57
  • Pharmacology 126
  • Statistics and Probability 108
Replace Hiroyuki Kasahara with:
Hiroyuki Kasahara Japan
Linda A. Anderson United Kingdom
Graham Farrell United Kingdom
Sheila M. Galloway United States
Christine A. Williams United Kingdom
Paul E. McNamara United States
Bhushan Patwardhan India
David J. Neep United Kingdom
Wolfgang Kraus Germany
Charles R. Evans United States
Jon E. Anderson relative to Hiroyuki Kasahara Japan Hiroyuki Kasahara's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.1×
Hiroyuki Kasahara · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon E. Anderson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon E. Anderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon E. Anderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon E. Anderson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon E. Anderson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon E. Anderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon E. Anderson. The network helps show where Jon E. Anderson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jon E. Anderson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon E. Anderson Line = papers co-authored together Jon E. Anderson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Use of Biological Assays to Evaluate Botanicals
Hit paper breakdown →
1998541
2 1991160
3 2019141
4 1990138
5 201298
6 199186
7 200979
8 201675
9 199273
10 201670
11 201262
12 199244
13 199343
14 199342
15 201539
16 199936
17 199236
18 199135
19 198829
20 200123

About Jon E. Anderson

Jon E. Anderson is a scholar working on Horticulture, Biochemistry, General Decision Sciences, Statistics and Probability and Forestry, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (13 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (9 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (5 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (4 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (3 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (3 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (3 papers) and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (288 citations), Biochemistry (629 citations), General Decision Sciences (57 citations), Pharmacology (126 citations) and Statistics and Probability (108 citations). Jon E. Anderson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jerry L. McLaughlin, Lingling L. Rogers, Xin-ping Fang, Phillip E. Fanwick, Ching‐Jer Chang, Stephen V. Burks, Ching-jer Chang, Scott Kuban, Alex Murray and Matthew Josefy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Tetrahedron, Journal of the American Statistical Association, SLEEP and The American Statistician.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026