Jon Dean

102 total papers · 576 total citations
27 papers, 332 citations indexed

About

Jon Dean is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Demography. According to data from OpenAlex, Jon Dean has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 332 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in General Health Professions and 6 papers in Demography. Recurrent topics in Jon Dean's work include Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (12 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (5 papers) and Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (5 papers). Jon Dean is often cited by papers focused on Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (12 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (5 papers) and Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (5 papers). Jon Dean collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Jon Dean's co-authors include Beth Breeze, Rachel Wood, Penny Furness, Daimark Bennett, Shengjiang Tan, Christopher Dayson, Tracey M. Coule and Rob Macmillan and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Cell Biology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and BMJ.

In The Last Decade

Jon Dean

26 papers receiving 320 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Jon Dean	239	77	56	33	29	27	332
Jerry D. Marx	164 0.7×	35 0.5×	38 0.7×	20 0.6×	23 0.8×	23	306
Malcolm Bush	176 0.7×	24 0.3×	57 1.0×	44 1.3×	17 0.6×	22	362
Tamara Kneese	183 0.8×	23 0.3×	60 1.1×	14 0.4×	14 0.5×	30	345
Joel I. Nelson	168 0.7×	20 0.3×	56 1.0×	75 2.3×	23 0.8×	29	328
Marina Karides	176 0.7×	24 0.3×	40 0.7×	37 1.1×	10 0.3×	30	342
Anders Vassenden	228 1.0×	17 0.2×	60 1.1×	49 1.5×	23 0.8×	33	326
Vikki McCall	121 0.5×	28 0.4×	50 0.9×	21 0.6×	31 1.1×	34	335
Andries van den Broek	207 0.9×	32 0.4×	25 0.4×	23 0.7×	10 0.3×	33	314
Betty Farrell	204 0.9×	34 0.4×	15 0.3×	41 1.2×	9 0.3×	17	356
Marek Loužek	175 0.7×	72 0.9×	18 0.3×	15 0.5×	11 0.4×	32	353

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Dean

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Dean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Dean

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Dean. The network helps show where Jon Dean may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jon Dean

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jon Dean. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jon Dean based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jon Dean. Jon Dean is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact