John Woo

50 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

John Woo
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Computational Mathematics 34
  • Genetics 530
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.1k
  • Neurology 505
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 360
Replace G Di Chiro with:
G Di Chiro United States
Deqiang Qiu United States
Antonella Castellano Italy
Maria Vittoria Spampinato United States
Dafna Ben Bashat Israel
Alonso Peña United Kingdom
Michael J. Ramsbottom United States
Maj Hedehus United States
Yibao Wang China
Bagrat Amirbekian United States
John Woo relative to G Di Chiro United States G Di Chiro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
G Di Chiro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Woo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Woo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Woo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Woo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Woo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Woo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Woo. The network helps show where John Woo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Woo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Woo Line = papers co-authored together John Woo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010389
2 2007212
3 2006165
4 2007161
5 200679
6 200977
7 200773
8
Diffusion tensor imaging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: volumetric analysis of the corticospinal tract.
200658
9 201452
10 200752
11 201947
12 201447
13 201046
14 201440
15 201439
16 201336
17 199434
18 201234
19
Magnocellular and parvocellular visual pathways have different blood oxygen level-dependent signal time courses in human primary visual cortex.
200632
20 201131

About John Woo

John Woo is a scholar working on Computational Mathematics, Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Genetics and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (12 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (9 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (6 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (6 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (5 papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (34 citations), Genetics (530 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.1k citations), Neurology (505 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (360 citations). John Woo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Elias R. Melhem, Miya R. Asato, Beatríz Luna, Robert Terwilliger, Jarosław Krejza, Harish Poptani, Lauren Elman, Leo McCluskey, Sumei Wang and Riyadh Alokaili. Their work appears in journals such as Radiology, American Journal of Neuroradiology, Academic Radiology, Neurology and Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026