John William Orchard

16.7k citations
238 papers · 12.4k · 7 hit papers · h-index 57

Impact in

    • Sports injuries and prevention
    • Sports Performance and Training
    • Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Surgery top 1%
    • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
    • Hip disorders and treatments
    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment

Papers in

John William Orchard

225 papers receiving 11.5k citations

John William Orchard's Hit Papers

International Olympic Committee consensus statement: methods for recording and reporting of epidemiological data on injury and illness in sport 2020 (including STROBE Extension for Sport Injury and Illness Surveillance (STROBE-SIIS)) 2020 · 722 citations
7220+4+9Years since publication250500750

Peers

John William Orchard
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 7.0k
  • Surgery 1.2k
  • Rehabilitation 124
  • Occupational Therapy 90
  • Urology 100
Replace Jan Ekstrand with:
Jan Ekstrand Sweden
Martin Hägglund Sweden
Kathrin Steffen Norway
Jill L. Cook Australia
Markus Waldén Sweden
Gino Kerkhoffs Netherlands
Grethe Myklebust Norway
Per A.F.H. Renström Sweden
Gordon O. Matheson United States
Donald T. Kirkendall United States
John William Orchard relative to Jan Ekstrand Sweden Jan Ekstrand's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Jan Ekstrand · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John William Orchard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John William Orchard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John William Orchard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John William Orchard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John William Orchard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John William Orchard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John William Orchard. The network helps show where John William Orchard may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John William Orchard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John William Orchard Line = papers co-authored together John William Orchard links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 238 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
How much is too much? (Part 1) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury
Hit paper breakdown →
2016771
2
International Olympic Committee consensus statement: methods for recording and reporting of epidemiological data on injury and illness in sport 2020 (including STROBE Extension for Sport Injury and Illness Surveillance (STROBE-SIIS))
Hit paper breakdown →
2020722
3
How much is too much? (Part 2) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of illness
Hit paper breakdown →
2016695
4 2002481
5
Terminology and classification of muscle injuries in sport: The Munich consensus statement
Hit paper breakdown →
2012441
6 1997403
7
Doha agreement meeting on terminology and definitions in groin pain in athletes
Hit paper breakdown →
2015376
8
Spikes in acute workload are associated with increased injury risk in elite cricket fast bowlers
Hit paper breakdown →
2013359
9 2001315
10 2007301
11 2012287
12 1993251
13
International Olympic Committee Consensus Statement: Methods for Recording and Reporting of Epidemiological Data on Injury and Illness in Sports 2020 (Including the STROBE Extension for Sports Injury and Illness Surveillance (STROBE-SIIS))
Hit paper breakdown →
2020250
14 2013229
15 2005215
16 2002196
17 2002177
18 2005177
19 2002170
20 2001162

About John William Orchard

John William Orchard is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery and Physiology, having authored 238 papers that have together received 12.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports injuries and prevention (108 papers), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (16 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (11 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (11 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (11 papers), Physical Activity and Health (5 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (3 papers) and Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (7.0k citations), Surgery (1.2k citations), Rehabilitation (124 citations), Occupational Therapy (90 citations) and Urology (100 citations). John William Orchard has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hugh G Seward, Jessica Joan Orchard, Thomas Michael Best, Katherine Rae, Tim J. Gabbett, D Garlick, Martin Hägglund, Alex Kountouris, Justin Paoloni and Stephen R. Lord. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Sports Medicine, Journal of science and medicine in sport, The Medical Journal of Australia, Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine and The American Journal of Sports Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact