John W. Gillespie
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Spectroscopy top 0.5%
- Cancer Research top 2%
- Oncology top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Michael R. Emmert‐BuckLance A. LiottaNicole L. SimoneCloud P. PaweletzEmanuel F. PetricoinRodrigo ChuaquiW. Marston LinehanVerena E. Bichsel
- Topics
- Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (22 papers)Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (14 papers)Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (11 papers)
- Journals
- Nature GeneticsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United StatesChileChina
In The Last Decade
John W. Gillespie
55 papers receiving 4.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- Molecular Biology 3.7k
- Spectroscopy 1.1k
- Cancer Research 892
- Oncology 727
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 687
Countries citing papers authored by John W. Gillespie
This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Gillespie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Gillespie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Gillespie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Gillespie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Gillespie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Gillespie. The network helps show where John W. Gillespie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John W. Gillespie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John W. Gillespie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John W. Gillespie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John W. Gillespie. John W. Gillespie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 77 | |
| 4 | 386 | |
| 5 | 35 | |
| 6 | 138 | |
| 7 | 137 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 74 | |
| 11 | 47 | |
| 12 | 46 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 147 | |
| 16 | 306 | |
| 17 | 335 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 234 |
About John W. Gillespie
John W. Gillespie is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (22 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (14 papers) and Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (1.1k citations), Cancer Research (892 citations) and Molecular Biology (3.7k citations). John W. Gillespie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and China. Frequent co-authors include Michael R. Emmert‐Buck, Lance A. Liotta, Nicole L. Simone, Cloud P. Paweletz, Emanuel F. Petricoin, Rodrigo Chuaqui, W. Marston Linehan, Verena E. Bichsel, Lu Charboneau and Mark J. Roth. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Genetics, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.