This map shows the geographic impact of John Stachel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Stachel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Stachel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Stachel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Stachel. The network helps show where John Stachel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Stachel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Stachel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Stachel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Stachel. John Stachel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stachel, John. (2014). Do Quanta Need a New Logic. 218.4 indexed citations
Einstein, Albert, John Stachel, Martin J. Klein, et al.. (2009). The collected papers of Albert Einstein. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).164 indexed citations
4.
Stachel, John. (2005). 1905 and all that. Nature. 433(7023). 215–217.9 indexed citations
5.
Janssen, Michel & John Stachel. (2004). The Optics and Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society).18 indexed citations
6.
Stachel, John. (1999). Einstein and Infeld, Seen Through Their Correspondence. AcPPB. 30(10). 2879.1 indexed citations
Cohen, Robert S., Kostas Gavroglu, John Stachel, & Marx W. Wartofsky. (1995). Science, Politics and Social Practice Essays on Marxism and Science, Philosophy of Culture and the Social Sciences : In Honor of Robert S. Cohen. Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks.2 indexed citations
10.
Cohen, R. S., Kostas Gavroglu, John Stachel, & Marx W. Wartofsky. (1995). Physics, philosophy, and the scientific community : essays in the philosophy and history of the natural sciences and mathematics in honor of Robert S. Cohen. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).4 indexed citations
11.
Cohen, R. S., et al.. (1995). Science, mind and art : essays on science and the humanistic understanding in art, epistemology, religion, and ethics in honor of Robert S. Cohen. Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks.1 indexed citations
12.
Ashtekar, Abhay & John Stachel. (1991). Conceptual problems of quantum gravity : based on the proceedings of the 1988 Osgood Hill Conference, North Andover, Massachusetts, 15-19 May 1988. Birkhäuser eBooks.1 indexed citations
Stachel, John. (1987). How Einstein discovered general relativity: a historical tale with some contemporary morals.. General Relativity and Gravitation. 200–208.9 indexed citations
15.
Stachel, John. (1986). What a physicist can learn from the discovery of general relativity.. 1857–1862.14 indexed citations
16.
Stachel, John. (1982). General Relativity. An Einstein Centenary Survey. General Relativity and Gravitation. 14. 107.2 indexed citations
Stachel, John. (1982). String dusts, fluids, and subspaces.. 241–259.
19.
Cohen, Robert S., Marx W. Wartofsky, John Stachel, & D. J. Struik. (1974). For Dirk Struik : scientific, historical, and political essays in honor of Dirk J. Struik.3 indexed citations
20.
Stachel, John. (1962). Lie Derivatives and the Cauchy Problem in the General Theory of Relativity.. PhDT.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.