Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Jackiw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Jackiw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Jackiw more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Jackiw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Jackiw. The network helps show where R. Jackiw may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Jackiw
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Jackiw.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Jackiw based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. Jackiw. R. Jackiw is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jackiw, R. & So-Young Pi. (2014). Fake Conformal Symmetry in Conformal Inflationary Models. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
3.
Jackiw, R., Yusuke Nishida, Luiz H. Santos, Claudio Chamon, & So-Young Pi. (2010). Quantizing Majorana fermions in a superconductor. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology).4 indexed citations
4.
Deser, S., R. Jackiw, & Shi Pi. (2005). Cotton blend gravity pp waves. Acta Physica Polonica B. 36(1). 27–34.9 indexed citations
5.
Jackiw, R.. (2004). Chern-Simons Integral as a Surface Term. arXiv (Cornell University).3 indexed citations
6.
Jackiw, R.. (2003). Two-dimensional Gravity from Three and Four Dimensions. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
7.
Jackiw, R., et al.. (2000). Supersymmetric fluid mechanics - art. no. 085019. Physical Review D. 6208(8).2 indexed citations
8.
Bazeia, D. & R. Jackiw. (1998). Field-dependent diffeomorphism symmetry in diverse dynamical systems. arXiv (Cornell University).5 indexed citations
9.
Deser, S. & R. Jackiw. (1992). Time Travel. arXiv (Cornell University).15 indexed citations
10.
Jackiw, R.. (1991). Update on planar gravity (physics of infinite cosmic strings). Presented at. 399–411.1 indexed citations
11.
Jackiw, R., Erick J. Weinberg, & S.-Y. Pi. (1990). Topological and Non-Topological Solitons in Relativistic and Non-Relativistic Chern-Simons Theory. Presented at. 268–286.7 indexed citations
Jackiw, R.. (1985). CHERN-SIMONS TERMS AND THEIR DESCENDENTS IN PHYSICAL THEORY. 332–335.1 indexed citations
15.
Jackiw, R.. (1985). Shelter Island II : proceedings of the 1983 Shelter Island Conference on Quantum Field Theory and the Fundamental Problems of Physics. MIT Press eBooks.15 indexed citations
16.
Jackiw, R.. (1985). Anomalies and Cocycles. 15(3). 99–116.7 indexed citations
Jackiw, R.. (1983). NONPERTURBATIVE AND TOPOLOGICAL METHODS IN QUANTUM FIELD THEORY. CERN Bulletin. 449–463.1 indexed citations
19.
Farhi, Edward & R. Jackiw. (1982). DYNAMICAL GAUGE SYMMETRY BREAKING. A COLLECTION OF REPRINTS. WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks.13 indexed citations
20.
Jackiw, R.. (1982). GAUGE THEORIES IN THREE-DIMENSIONS (= AT HIGH TEMPERATURE). CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.