C. Nash
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics 10
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies 6
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions 6
- High-Energy Particle Collisions Research 4
-
- Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories 7
- Mathematical Physics top 5%
- Modeling and Simulation top 10%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
-
- Algebraic and Geometric Analysis 7
-
- Quantum many-body systems 5
- Quantum Mechanics and Applications 4
- Co-authors
- Siddhartha SenJohn StachelC. AdamBruno MuratoriDenjoe O’ConnorG. C. JoshiBrian P. DolanR.L. Kingsley
- Partner nations
- IrelandUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
C. Nash
37 papers receiving 519 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 236
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 179
- Mathematical Physics 121
- Modeling and Simulation 38
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 116
Countries citing papers authored by C. Nash
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Nash more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Nash
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Nash. The network helps show where C. Nash may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 16 scholars most cited alongside C. Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 25 | |
| 7 | INTEGRAL REPRESENTATIONS OF THE KINKELIN'S CONSTANT A | 1997 | 1 |
| 8 | 1992 | 9 | |
| 9 | Differential Topology and Quantum Field Theory | 1991 | 36 |
| 10 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1986 | 232 | |
| 14 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1983 | 6 | |
| 16 | Relativistic quantum fields | 1978 | 51 |
| 17 | 1976 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1973 | 12 | |
| 19 | 1973 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1972 | 6 |
About C. Nash
C. Nash is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mathematical Physics, Applied Mathematics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Geometry and Topology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 588 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (10 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (7 papers), Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (7 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (6 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (6 papers), Quantum many-body systems (5 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (4 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (236 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (179 citations), Mathematical Physics (121 citations), Modeling and Simulation (38 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (116 citations). C. Nash has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Siddhartha Sen, John Stachel, C. Adam, Bruno Muratori, Denjoe O’Connor, G. C. Joshi, Brian P. Dolan, R.L. Kingsley, Carl M. Bender and Gayatri Joshi. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B, Communications in Mathematical Physics and Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.