John Silk

923 citations
39 papers · 590 indexed · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

John Silk

39 papers receiving 547 citations

Peers

John Silk
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 263
  • Geography, Planning and Development 83
  • Radiation 68
  • Urban Studies 27
  • Development 16
Replace Peter Fisher with:
Peter Fisher United Kingdom
David H. Kaplan United States
D. Botterill United Kingdom
F. C. Jones United States
Michael D. Lieber United States
Bernice Martin United Kingdom
Gabriel Sheffer Israel
J.D. Sherman United States
William G. Feighery United States
Markus Loewe Germany
John Silk relative to Peter Fisher United Kingdom Peter Fisher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Peter Fisher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Silk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Silk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Silk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Silk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Silk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Silk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Silk. The network helps show where John Silk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Silk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Silk Line = papers co-authored together John Silk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200477
2 199852
3 198848
4 199845
5 200040
6
Statistical concepts in geography
197939
7 198623
8 198322
9 198822
10 198021
11 198920
12 198218
13 199015
14 198114
15 199214
16 199310
17 19919
18
Analysis of covariance and comparison of regression lines
19799
19 19908
20 19888

About John Silk

John Silk is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Geography, Planning and Development, Radiation, Urban Studies and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 590 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear physics research studies (21 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (15 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (6 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (5 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (4 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (4 papers) and Urban Planning and Governance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (263 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (83 citations), Radiation (68 citations), Urban Studies (27 citations) and Development (16 citations). John Silk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include H. T. Fortune, Sophia Bowlby, J. D. Zumbro, S. Mordechaǐ, H. D. Holmgren, P. G. Roos, C. Fred Moore, H. Breuer, N. S. Chant and D.L. Hendrie. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Physical Review Letters, Ethics Place & Environment, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers and American Literature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026