Michael D. Lieber

927 citations
62 papers · 590 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Michael D. Lieber

59 papers receiving 472 citations

Peers

Michael D. Lieber
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 219
  • Archeology 5
  • Cultural Studies 37
  • Geography, Planning and Development 24
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 48
Replace R. L. Cooper with:
R. L. Cooper United States
J. L. Heilbron United States
Arthur Zajonc United States
Richard Gott United Kingdom
Bernice Martin United Kingdom
K. Brecher United States
V. N. Mansfield United States
Lewis Pyenson United States
A. Kernan United States
Robert Schulmann United States
Michael D. Lieber relative to R. L. Cooper United States R. L. Cooper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
R. L. Cooper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael D. Lieber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael D. Lieber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael D. Lieber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael D. Lieber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael D. Lieber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael D. Lieber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael D. Lieber. The network helps show where Michael D. Lieber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael D. Lieber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael D. Lieber Line = papers co-authored together Michael D. Lieber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997106
2 199853
3 196839
4 199630
5 198126
6 197325
7 197424
8 197320
9 197217
10 197117
11 197216
12 197512
13 199111
14 198411
15 198210
16 19829
17 19769
18 19819
19 19818
20 19818

About Michael D. Lieber

Michael D. Lieber is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Aerospace Engineering and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 62 papers that have together received 590 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (11 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (10 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (6 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (6 papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (4 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (4 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (4 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (219 citations), Archeology (5 citations), Cultural Studies (37 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (24 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (48 citations). Michael D. Lieber has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter Harries‐Jones, Wim Wiewel, F. T. Chan, A. M. Mukhamedzhanov, Peter T. Furst, Selwyn D. Ryan, Tak‐San Ho, Larry Spruch, Leonard Rosenberg and Lyn H. Lofland. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific studies, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Journal of American Folklore, American Anthropologist and Ethnohistory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact