Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
European Opinion About Immigration: The Role of Identities, Interests and Information
2007734 citationsJohn Sides, Jack CitrinBritish Journal of Political Scienceprofile →
Identity Crisis
2018253 citationsJohn Sides, Michael Tesler et al.Princeton University Press eBooksprofile →
The Muted Consequences of Correct Information about Immigration
2018167 citationsJohn Sides, Jack Citrin et al.The Journal of Politicsprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of John Sides's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Sides with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Sides more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Sides. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Sides. The network helps show where John Sides may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Sides
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Sides.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Sides based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Sides. John Sides is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sides, John, Chris Tausanovitch, & Lynn Vavreck. (2023). The Bitter End. Princeton University Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
2.
Sides, John, Michael Tesler, & Lynn Vavreck. (2019). Identity Crisis. Princeton University Press eBooks.84 indexed citations
3.
Sides, John, Michael Tesler, & Lynn Vavreck. (2018). Identity Crisis. Princeton University Press eBooks.253 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Sides, John, Chris Tausanovitch, Lynn Vavreck, & Christopher Warshaw. (2018). On the Representativeness of Primary Electorates. British Journal of Political Science. 50(2). 677–685.30 indexed citations
5.
Sides, John, Michael Tesler, & Lynn Vavreck. (2016). The Electoral Landscape of 2016. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 667(1). 50–71.23 indexed citations
6.
Highton, Benjamin, Eric McGhee, & John Sides. (2015). ELECTION LAB POST-MORTEM. PS Political Science & Politics. 48(2). 298–299.1 indexed citations
Lawrence, Eric & John Sides. (2011). The Consequences of Political Innumeracy. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
15.
Sides, John & Henry Farrell. (2010). The Kos Bump: The Political Economy of Campaign Fundraising in the Internet Age. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
Sides, John & Jack Citrin. (2007). European Opinion About Immigration: The Role of Identities, Interests and Information. British Journal of Political Science. 37(3). 477–504.734 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Elkins, Zachary & John Sides. (2006). In Search of the Unified Nation-State: National Attachment among Distinctive Citizens. eScholarship (California Digital Library).3 indexed citations
20.
Sides, John. (2006). The Origins of Campaign Agendas. British Journal of Political Science. 36(3). 407–436.193 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.