Ted Brader

5.3k total citations · 4 hit papers
35 papers, 3.1k citations indexed

About

Ted Brader is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Ted Brader has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 3.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 19 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 10 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Ted Brader's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (20 papers), Social Media and Politics (9 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers). Ted Brader is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (20 papers), Social Media and Politics (9 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers). Ted Brader collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Italy. Ted Brader's co-authors include Nicholas A. Valentino, Elizabeth Suhay, Joshua A. Tucker, Vincent L. Hutchings, Eric Groenendyk, Ashley Jardina, George E. Marcus, Timothy J. Ryan, Lorenzo De Sio and David L. Featherman and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Political Science, The Journal of Politics and Public Opinion Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Ted Brader

34 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Hit Papers

What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, ... 2005 2026 2012 2019 2008 2005 2011 2012 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ted Brader United States 17 2.2k 1.4k 884 307 290 35 3.1k
Vincent L. Hutchings United States 18 2.7k 1.2× 1.7k 1.2× 868 1.0× 323 1.1× 543 1.9× 30 3.6k
Costas Panagopoulos United States 27 1.6k 0.7× 1.1k 0.7× 835 0.9× 228 0.7× 236 0.8× 124 2.6k
Howard Lavine United States 26 1.9k 0.9× 1.1k 0.7× 551 0.6× 674 2.2× 304 1.0× 42 2.9k
André Krouwel Netherlands 26 1.6k 0.7× 1.2k 0.9× 480 0.5× 292 1.0× 214 0.7× 114 2.6k
David P. Redlawsk United States 22 2.1k 1.0× 2.2k 1.5× 1.3k 1.4× 234 0.8× 466 1.6× 62 3.6k
Tali Mendelberg United States 20 2.2k 1.0× 1.7k 1.2× 749 0.8× 164 0.5× 802 2.8× 48 3.3k
Samara Klar United States 18 1.4k 0.7× 1.1k 0.8× 818 0.9× 157 0.5× 285 1.0× 37 2.2k
Yanna Krupnikov United States 24 1.3k 0.6× 1.1k 0.8× 738 0.8× 116 0.4× 402 1.4× 55 2.2k
John Barry Ryan United States 23 1.2k 0.5× 731 0.5× 607 0.7× 142 0.5× 298 1.0× 63 1.8k
David Doherty United States 19 1.4k 0.6× 903 0.6× 357 0.4× 311 1.0× 275 0.9× 57 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Ted Brader

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ted Brader's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ted Brader with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ted Brader more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ted Brader

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ted Brader. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ted Brader. The network helps show where Ted Brader may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ted Brader

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ted Brader. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ted Brader based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ted Brader. Ted Brader is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
DeBell, Matthew, Natalya C. Maisel, Ted Brader, Catherine S. Wilson, & Simon Jackman. (2021). Improving the Measurement of “Big Five” Personality Traits in a Brief Survey Instrument. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 38(2). 150–161. 4 indexed citations
2.
Brader, Ted, et al.. (2020). “Where You Lead, I Will Follow”: Partisan Cueing on High‐Salience Issues in a Turbulent Multiparty System. Political Psychology. 41(4). 795–812. 14 indexed citations
3.
Ryan, Timothy J. & Ted Brader. (2015). Gaffe Appeal A Field Experiment on Partisan Selective Exposure to Election Messages. Political Science Research and Methods. 5(4). 667–687. 11 indexed citations
4.
Tucker, Joshua A., et al.. (2014). Do parties still orient voters in times of crisis? Experimental evidence of partisan cueing effects in 2013.
5.
Brader, Ted & George E. Marcus. (2013). Emotion and Political Psychology. Oxford University Press eBooks. 139 indexed citations
6.
Ryan, Timothy J. & Ted Brader. (2013). Partisan Selective Exposure in the Digital Age: Evidence from Field Experiments. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
7.
Brader, Ted, et al.. (2012). Which Parties Can Lead Opinion? Experimental Evidence on Partisan Cue Taking in Multiparty Democracies. Comparative Political Studies. 46(11). 1485–1517. 101 indexed citations
8.
Groenendyk, Eric, Ted Brader, & Nicholas A. Valentino. (2011). The Only Thing We Have to Fear? The Relationship between Emotions, Appraisals, and Scapegoating. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
9.
Brader, Ted & Joshua A. Tucker. (2011). Follow the Leader: Party Cues, Policy Opinion, and the Power of Partisanship in Three Multiparty Systems. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 51(256). 1–8. 8 indexed citations
10.
Brader, Ted. (2011). The Political Relevance of Emotions: “Reassessing” Revisited. Political Psychology. 32(2). 337–346. 36 indexed citations
11.
Valentino, Nicholas A. & Ted Brader. (2011). The Sword's Other Edge: Perceptions of Discrimination and Racial Policy Opinion after Obama. Public Opinion Quarterly. 75(2). 201–226. 66 indexed citations
12.
Brader, Ted, Nicholas A. Valentino, Ashley Jardina, & Timothy J. Ryan. (2010). The Racial Divide on Immigration Opinion: Why Blacks Are Less Threatened by Immigrants 1. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6 indexed citations
13.
Brader, Ted & Nicholas A. Valentino. (2010). When is Terrorism Terrifying. 1 indexed citations
14.
Brader, Ted, Nicholas A. Valentino, & Ashley Jardina. (2009). Immigration Opinion in a Time of Economic Crisis: Material Interests versus Group Attitudes. SSRN Electronic Journal. 8 indexed citations
15.
Brader, Ted & Joshua A. Tucker. (2009). Follow the Leader: Party Cues, Partisans, and Public Opinion in Old and New Democracies. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations
16.
Brader, Ted & Joshua A. Tucker. (2009). What's Left Behind When the Party's Over: Survey Experiments on the Effects of Partisan Cues in Putin's Russia. Politics & Policy. 37(4). 843–868. 33 indexed citations
17.
Brader, Ted, Nicholas A. Valentino, & Elizabeth Suhay. (2008). What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat. American Journal of Political Science. 52(4). 959–978. 784 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Brader, Ted. (2005). Campaigning for Hearts and Minds. 116 indexed citations
19.
Brader, Ted. (2005). Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions. American Journal of Political Science. 49(2). 388–388. 34 indexed citations
20.
Traugott, Michael W., Ted Brader, Richard T. Curtin, et al.. (2002). How Americans Responded: A Study of Public Reactions to 9/11/01. PS Political Science & Politics. 35(3). 511–516. 51 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026