John S. Chandler

424 citations
15 papers · 341 indexed · h-index 8

John S. Chandler

15 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

John S. Chandler
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Artificial Intelligence 170
  • Management Science and Operations Research 106
  • Accounting 88
  • Information Systems 72
  • Management Information Systems 61
Replace Paul R. Watkins with:
Paul R. Watkins United States
Jia‐Lang Seng Taiwan
Ravindra Krovi United States
Tomas Eklund Finland
Hironori Takeuchi Japan
Paul L. Bowen Australia
Samer Alhawari Jordan
V. Tampakas Greece
Gad Ariav United States
Palash Bera United States
John S. Chandler relative to Paul R. Watkins United States Paul R. Watkins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Paul R. Watkins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John S. Chandler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John S. Chandler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John S. Chandler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John S. Chandler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John S. Chandler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John S. Chandler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John S. Chandler. The network helps show where John S. Chandler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John S. Chandler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John S. Chandler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John S. Chandler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John S. Chandler. John S. Chandler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 20
3 20
4 58
5
On the decision making problem in Dempster-Shafer theory / 91-172
4
6 22
7 81
8 51
9 3
10
Analysis of audit judgment through an expert system / 982
5
11
Pre-conditions for the introduction of computer-based accounting systems in less developed countries / 992
2
12 58
13
Techniques of Scenario Planning
11
14 2
15
A Methodology for the Performance Evaluation of Information Systems Under Multiple Criteria.
2

About John S. Chandler

John S. Chandler is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research and Accounting, having authored 15 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stock Market Forecasting Methods (3 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (2 papers) and Forecasting Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (106 citations), Accounting (88 citations) and Management Information Systems (61 citations). John S. Chandler has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Ingoo Han, Ting‐Peng Liang, Jinsheng Roan, Patrick R. Laughlin, Vicki J. Magley, Lorne Hulbert, Rachel Schwartz, David C. Wilkins and Henrike Hölzer. Their work appears in journals such as MIS Quarterly, Expert Systems with Applications and Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026