John R. Schroeter

1.3k total citations
27 papers, 853 citations indexed

About

John R. Schroeter is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Marketing. According to data from OpenAlex, John R. Schroeter has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 853 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 12 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and 8 papers in Marketing. Recurrent topics in John R. Schroeter's work include Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (14 papers), Merger and Competition Analysis (8 papers) and Global trade and economics (8 papers). John R. Schroeter is often cited by papers focused on Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (14 papers), Merger and Competition Analysis (8 papers) and Global trade and economics (8 papers). John R. Schroeter collaborates with scholars based in United States. John R. Schroeter's co-authors include Azzeddine Azzam, Herbert Mohring, Paitoon Wiboonchutikula, Steven R. Cox, Mingxia Zhang, Aju J. Fenn, Craig A. Gallet, J. David Aiken and Mohammad Mainul Hoque and has published in prestigious journals such as The Review of Economics and Statistics, The RAND Journal of Economics and American Journal of Agricultural Economics.

In The Last Decade

John R. Schroeter

27 papers receiving 696 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John R. Schroeter United States 14 636 261 215 176 115 27 853
Bonwoo Koo Canada 14 115 0.2× 91 0.3× 46 0.2× 114 0.6× 57 0.5× 34 514
Monika Roman Poland 12 117 0.2× 23 0.1× 55 0.3× 18 0.1× 87 0.8× 38 418
David Ashmore Australia 12 167 0.3× 112 0.4× 4 0.0× 15 0.1× 173 1.5× 24 600
Magdalena Kapelko Poland 19 318 0.5× 98 0.4× 71 0.3× 77 0.4× 6 0.1× 59 876
Anna Křižanová Slovakia 13 105 0.2× 253 1.0× 15 0.1× 10 0.1× 18 0.2× 43 558
José Murteira Portugal 7 180 0.3× 24 0.1× 44 0.2× 44 0.3× 14 0.1× 15 497
Liang Lu United States 13 141 0.2× 76 0.3× 111 0.5× 10 0.1× 11 0.1× 23 537
Joris Beckers Belgium 11 86 0.1× 248 1.0× 7 0.0× 14 0.1× 166 1.4× 30 580
Christos Constantatos Greece 10 170 0.3× 132 0.5× 8 0.0× 51 0.3× 22 0.2× 19 333
Rachel J. C. Chen United States 13 60 0.1× 265 1.0× 5 0.0× 9 0.1× 59 0.5× 33 608

Countries citing papers authored by John R. Schroeter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Schroeter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Schroeter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Schroeter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Schroeter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Schroeter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Schroeter. The network helps show where John R. Schroeter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John R. Schroeter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John R. Schroeter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John R. Schroeter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John R. Schroeter. John R. Schroeter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schroeter, John R., et al.. (2017). A Re-Examination of Multistage Economies in Hog Farming. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization. 15(2). 2 indexed citations
2.
Schroeter, John R.. (2007). Agricultural Commodity Markets and Trade: New Approaches to Analyzing Market Structure and Instability. Agricultural Economics. 36(1). 131–132. 39 indexed citations
3.
Schroeter, John R., Azzeddine Azzam, & J. David Aiken. (2006). Anti‐Corporate Farming Laws and Industry Structure: The Case of Cattle Feeding. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 88(4). 1000–1014. 8 indexed citations
4.
Fenn, Aju J. & John R. Schroeter. (2004). Cigarettes and addiction information: simulating the demand effects of the tobacco industry's ‘conspiracy of silence’. Applied Economics. 36(19). 2151–2159. 3 indexed citations
5.
Fenn, Aju J., et al.. (2001). Cigarettes and addiction information: new evidence in support of the rational addiction model. Economics Letters. 72(1). 39–45. 25 indexed citations
6.
Schroeter, John R., Azzeddine Azzam, & Mingxia Zhang. (2000). Measuring Market Power in Bilateral Oligopoly: The Wholesale Market for Beef. Southern Economic Journal. 66(3). 526–526. 27 indexed citations
7.
Schroeter, John R., Azzeddine Azzam, & Mingxia Zhang. (2000). Measuring Market Power in Bilateral Oligopoly: The Wholesale Market for Beef. Southern Economic Journal. 66(3). 526–547. 6 indexed citations
8.
Azzam, Azzeddine, et al.. (1997). Concentration in Beef Packing: Do Gains Outweigh Losses?. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 12(1). 1–3. 5 indexed citations
9.
Azzam, Azzeddine & John R. Schroeter. (1995). The Tradeoff between Oligopsony Power and Cost Efficiency in Horizontal Consolidation: An Example from Beef Packing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 77(4). 825–836. 75 indexed citations
10.
Gallet, Craig A. & John R. Schroeter. (1995). The effects of the business cycle on oligopoly coordination: Evidence from the U.S. rayon industry. Review of Industrial Organization. 10(2). 181–196. 15 indexed citations
11.
Mohring, Herbert & John R. Schroeter. (1991). The Costs of Inefficient Fishery Regulation: A Partial Study of Pacific Halibut. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University). 2 indexed citations
12.
Azzam, Azzeddine, et al.. (1991). IMPLICATIONS OF INCREASED REGIONAL CONCENTRATION AND OLIGOPSONISTIC COORDINATION IN THE BEEF PACKING INDUSTRY. Journal of agricultural and resource economics. 16(2). 374–381. 27 indexed citations
13.
Schroeter, John R.. (1990). Measuring Market Power in Food‐Processing Industries: Discussion. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 72(5). 1227–1229. 2 indexed citations
14.
Schroeter, John R., et al.. (1990). Measuring the nearness of modern near-monies: Evidence from the 1980s. Journal of Macroeconomics. 12(2). 247–261. 7 indexed citations
15.
Schroeter, John R. & Azzeddine Azzam. (1990). Measuring market power in multi-product oligopolies: the US meat industry. Applied Economics. 22(10). 1365–1376. 80 indexed citations
16.
Schroeter, John R.. (1988). Estimating the Degree of Market Power in the Beef Packing Industry. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 70(1). 158–158. 201 indexed citations
17.
Schroeter, John R., et al.. (1987). Advertising and Competition in Routine Legal Service Markets: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Industrial Economics. 36(1). 49–49. 34 indexed citations
18.
Schroeter, John R., et al.. (1986). A Reexamination of the Rationality of the Livingston Price Expectations: Note. Journal of money credit and banking. 18(2). 239–239. 10 indexed citations
19.
Cox, Steven R., et al.. (1985). Attorney advertising and the quality of routine legal services. Review of Industrial Organization. 2(4). 340–354. 5 indexed citations
20.
Schroeter, John R.. (1983). A Model of Taxi Service Under Fare Structure and Fleet Size Regulation. Staff General Research Papers Archive. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026