John Quah

1.0k citations
29 papers · 468 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

John Quah

29 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers

John Quah
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • General Decision Sciences 110
  • Management Science and Operations Research 183
  • Economics and Econometrics 357
  • Marketing 67
  • Safety Research 56
Replace Edward E. Schlee with:
Edward E. Schlee United States
Thomas Demuynck Belgium
Lars–Gunnar Svensson Sweden
Enrico Minelli Italy
Benyamin Shitovitz Israel
Hamid Sabourian United Kingdom
Ariel Rubinstein Israel
Muhamet Yıldız United States
Aloísio Araújo Brazil
Ana B. Ania Austria
John Quah relative to Edward E. Schlee United States Edward E. Schlee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Edward E. Schlee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Quah

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Quah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Quah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Quah more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Quah

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Quah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Quah. The network helps show where John Quah may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside John Quah, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Quah Line = papers co-authored together John Quah links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200770
2 200966
3 201265
4 201734
5 201331
6 201328
7 201226
8 200023
9 199722
10 200316
11 201314
12 20229
13 20059
14 20037
15 20147
16 20186
17 20225
18 20055
19 20084
20 20104

About John Quah

John Quah is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research, Marketing and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (19 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (11 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (8 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (6 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (5 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (4 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (110 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (183 citations), Economics and Econometrics (357 citations), Marketing (67 citations) and Safety Research (56 citations). John Quah has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Bruno Strulovici, Rahul Deb, Efe A. Ok, James Fenske, Robert A. Ritz, Cameron Hepburn, Dionisios Margetis, Juan Enrique Martínez-Legaz, Jörg Stoye and Yuichi Kitamura. Their work appears in journals such as Econometrica, Economic Theory, Journal of Mathematical Economics, Journal of Political Economy and The Review of Economics and Statistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact