Hamid Sabourian
-
- Game Theory and Applications 18
- Auction Theory and Applications 7
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies 7
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Economic theories and models 12
- Game Theory and Voting Systems 9
- Merger and Competition Analysis 1
- Economic Policies and Impacts 1
-
- Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms 2
Hamid Sabourian
21 papers receiving 392 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Management Science and Operations Research 251
- General Decision Sciences 30
- Safety Research 104
- Economics and Econometrics 279
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 37
Countries citing papers authored by Hamid Sabourian
This map shows the geographic impact of Hamid Sabourian's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hamid Sabourian with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hamid Sabourian more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hamid Sabourian
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hamid Sabourian. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hamid Sabourian. The network helps show where Hamid Sabourian may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Hamid Sabourian, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 3 | Repeated Implementation with Incomplete Information | 2013 | 4 |
| 4 | Repeated Implementation with Finite Mechanisms and Complexity | 2012 | 1 |
| 5 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 38 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 30 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 38 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 15 | Bargaining and Markets: Complexity and the Walrasian Outcome | 2000 | 7 |
| 16 | 2000 | 55 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 26 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 23 | |
| 19 | 1990 | 30 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 4 |
About Hamid Sabourian
Hamid Sabourian is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 415 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Applications (18 papers), Economic theories and models (12 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (9 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (7 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (2 papers), Merger and Competition Analysis (1 paper) and Economic Policies and Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (251 citations), General Decision Sciences (30 citations) and Safety Research (104 citations). Hamid Sabourian has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Kalyan Chatterjee, Douglas Gale, Jihong Lee, Andreas Park, Luca Anderlini, Guilherme Carmona, P. Bag, Eyal Winter, Anne Sibert and Toke Aidt. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Theory, Econometrica, Games and Economic Behavior, Mathematical Social Sciences and National Institute Economic Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.