John Picione
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
- Chemical Synthesis and Reactions
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
-
- Enzyme Production and Characterization
Papers in
-
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 8
- Chemical Synthesis and Reactions 2
- Multicomponent Synthesis of Heterocycles 2
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 1
-
- Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 4
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 2
- Co-authors
- David Crich (9 shared papers)Mark R. Smith (2 shared papers)Qingjia Yao (2 shared papers)A. U. Vinod (3 shared papers)Abhisek Banerjee (1 shared paper)Prasanna Jayalath (1 shared paper)Thomas K. Hutton (1 shared paper)Donald J. Wink (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Tetrahedron Letters (1 paper)Organic Letters (1 paper)Synlett (1 paper)Synthesis (1 paper)Tetrahedron Asymmetry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John Picione
11 papers receiving 355 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Organic Chemistry 336
- Biotechnology 45
- Molecular Biology 274
- Plant Science 69
- Process Chemistry and Technology 5
Countries citing papers authored by John Picione
This map shows the geographic impact of John Picione's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Picione with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Picione more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Picione
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Picione. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Picione. The network helps show where John Picione may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside John Picione, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 110 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 59 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 17 | |
| 6 | Approximate H(5) Ring Conformation of 2,3-O-Carbonate Protected α- and β-L-Rhamnopyranosides as Confirmed by X-Ray Crystallography. | 2005 | 14 |
| 7 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 8 | Data-Driven Implementation and Adaptation of New Teaching Methodologies | 2010 | 9 |
| 9 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 0 |
About John Picione
John Picione is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Plant Science and Pharmacology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (8 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (4 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (2 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (2 papers), Multicomponent Synthesis of Heterocycles (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers) and Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (336 citations), Biotechnology (45 citations), Molecular Biology (274 citations), Plant Science (69 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (5 citations). John Picione has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David Crich, Mark R. Smith, Qingjia Yao, A. U. Vinod, Abhisek Banerjee, Prasanna Jayalath, Thomas K. Hutton, Donald J. Wink, Thomas A. Holme and Kristen L. Murphy. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, Organic Letters, Synlett, Synthesis and Tetrahedron Asymmetry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.