Stuart J. Ince

491 total citations
10 papers, 383 citations indexed

About

Stuart J. Ince is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Stuart J. Ince has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 383 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Organic Chemistry, 5 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Stuart J. Ince's work include Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (6 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers) and Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (3 papers). Stuart J. Ince is often cited by papers focused on Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (6 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers) and Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (3 papers). Stuart J. Ince collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Germany. Stuart J. Ince's co-authors include Steven V. Ley, Daniel K. Baeschlin, Dieter Enders, Michael G. Hahn, Luke G. Green, Alison C. Foster, Henning Priepke, Dominic J. Reynolds, Darren J. Dixon and Berthold Hinzen and has published in prestigious journals such as Chemical Reviews, Chemistry - A European Journal and Synthesis.

In The Last Decade

Stuart J. Ince

10 papers receiving 375 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stuart J. Ince United Kingdom 8 357 241 37 35 22 10 383
Andrew B. Naughton Switzerland 8 267 0.7× 202 0.8× 21 0.6× 30 0.9× 8 0.4× 12 327
Claudia G. Lucero United States 3 375 1.1× 241 1.0× 35 0.9× 47 1.3× 8 0.4× 5 393
Robert Rodebaugh United States 10 437 1.2× 347 1.4× 71 1.9× 32 0.9× 8 0.4× 11 480
Eric Walther Switzerland 8 426 1.2× 184 0.8× 28 0.8× 32 0.9× 25 1.1× 10 447
John Picione United States 8 336 0.9× 274 1.1× 69 1.9× 45 1.3× 8 0.4× 12 359
Mads Heuckendorff Denmark 14 494 1.4× 426 1.8× 76 2.1× 29 0.8× 9 0.4× 22 528
Valérie Fargeas France 11 411 1.2× 180 0.7× 19 0.5× 39 1.1× 10 0.5× 20 462
Erwin R. van Rijssel Netherlands 11 301 0.8× 214 0.9× 23 0.6× 41 1.2× 22 1.0× 14 356
M. S. M. Pearson-Long France 11 479 1.3× 213 0.9× 21 0.6× 27 0.8× 9 0.4× 28 495
C. Srinivas Rao United States 8 416 1.2× 327 1.4× 64 1.7× 65 1.9× 10 0.5× 10 454

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart J. Ince

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart J. Ince's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart J. Ince with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart J. Ince more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart J. Ince

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart J. Ince. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart J. Ince. The network helps show where Stuart J. Ince may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart J. Ince

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart J. Ince. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart J. Ince based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart J. Ince. Stuart J. Ince is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Eis, Knut, et al.. (2005). Kinase Data Mining: Dealing with the Information (Over‐)Flow. ChemBioChem. 6(3). 567–570. 1 indexed citations
2.
Enders, Dieter, et al.. (2002). Preparation and Reactions of 2,2-Dimethyl-1,3-dioxan-5-one-SAMP-Hydrazone: A Versatile Chiral Dihydroxyacetone Equivalent. Synthesis. 2002(12). 1775–1779. 43 indexed citations
4.
Enders, Dieter, Stuart J. Ince, Melanie Bonnekessel, Jan Runsink, & Gerhard Raabe. (2002). Chiral Dihydroxyacetone Equivalents in Synthesis: Rapid Assembly of Styryl 1,2-Polyols as an Entry to the Styryllactone Family of Natural Products. Synlett. 2002(6). 962–966. 7 indexed citations
5.
Baeschlin, Daniel K., et al.. (2000). 1,2-Diacetals in Synthesis: Total Synthesis of a Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Anchor ofTrypanosoma brucei. Chemistry - A European Journal. 6(1). 172–186. 72 indexed citations
6.
Ley, Steven V., Daniel K. Baeschlin, Darren J. Dixon, et al.. (2000). 1,2-Diacetals:  A New Opportunity for Organic Synthesis. Chemical Reviews. 101(1). 53–80. 132 indexed citations
7.
Baeschlin, Daniel K., Luke G. Green, Michael G. Hahn, et al.. (2000). Rapid assembly of oligosaccharides: 1,2-diacetal-mediated reactivity tuning in the coupling of glycosyl fluorides. Tetrahedron Asymmetry. 11(1). 173–197. 49 indexed citations
8.
Baeschlin, Daniel K., et al.. (2000). 1,2-Diacetals in Synthesis: Total Synthesis of a Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Anchor of Trypanosoma brucei. Chemistry - A European Journal. 6(1). 172–186. 3 indexed citations
9.
Green, Luke, Berthold Hinzen, Stuart J. Ince, et al.. (1998). One-pot Synthesis of Penta- and Hepta-saccharides from Monomeric Mannose Building Blocks Using the Principles of Orthogonality and Reactivity Tuning. Synlett. 1998(4). 440–442. 34 indexed citations
10.
Langer, Peter, Stuart J. Ince, & Steven V. Ley. (1998). Assembly of dendritic glycoclusters from monomeric mannose building blocks. Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1. 3913–3916. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026