John Penders

164 papers receiving 11.5k citations

Hit Papers

microViz: an R package for microbiome data visualization and statistics 2021 · 259 citations
259200620262012201950010001.5k

Peers

John Penders
Comparison fields: 5 of 179
  • Molecular Medicine 1.4k
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 326
  • Gastroenterology 863
  • Pharmacy 652
  • Endocrinology 583
Replace James Versalovic with:
James Versalovic United States
Sydney M. Finegold United States
Paul B. Eckburg United States
Susan V. Lynch United States
Vincent B. Young United States
Knut Rudi Norway
Bruno Pot Belgium
John C. Alverdy United States
Gautam Dantas United States
Les Dethlefsen United States
John Penders relative to James Versalovic United States James Versalovic's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
James Versalovic · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Penders

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Penders's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Penders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Penders more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Penders

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Penders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Penders. The network helps show where John Penders may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Penders, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Penders Line = papers co-authored together John Penders links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 202428
4 202411
5 20245
6 202327
7 20238
8 20222
9 202228
10 202216
11 202110
12 202128
13 202182
14 202156
15
microViz: an R package for microbiome data visualization and statistics
Hit paper breakdown →
2021259
16 2020139
17 201971
18 201879
19 2017205
20
Factors Influencing the Composition of the Intestinal Microbiota in Early Infancy
Hit paper breakdown →
20061646

About John Penders

John Penders is a scholar working on Molecular Medicine, Endocrinology, Emergency Medical Services, Pharmacy and Infectious Diseases, having authored 169 papers that have together received 11.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gut microbiota and health (98 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (24 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (22 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (21 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (20 papers), Pediatric health and respiratory diseases (15 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (13 papers) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (1.4k citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (326 citations), Gastroenterology (863 citations), Pharmacy (652 citations) and Endocrinology (583 citations). John Penders has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Carel Thijs, Ellen E. Stobberingh, Piet A. van den Brandt, Ischa Kummeling, Foekje F. Stelma, Bianca E.P. Snijders, Cornelis Vink, Petra Wolffs, Paul H. M. Savelkoul and Christian J. H. von Wintersdorff. Their work appears in journals such as Gut Microbes, Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Microbiology and Future Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026