Fade R. Eadeh

443 total citations
8 papers, 230 citations indexed

About

Fade R. Eadeh is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Fade R. Eadeh has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 230 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Social Psychology, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Fade R. Eadeh's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (3 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). Fade R. Eadeh is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (3 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). Fade R. Eadeh collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and France. Fade R. Eadeh's co-authors include Alan J. Lambert, Stephanie Allison Peak, John Paul Schott, Katharine Chang, Laura D. Scherer, Nicholas S. Holtzman, Amélie Godefroidt, Yara Mahfud, Éric Bonetto and Marcos Dono and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Computers in Human Behavior and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

In The Last Decade

Fade R. Eadeh

8 papers receiving 223 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Fade R. Eadeh United States 7 160 109 81 61 28 8 230
Christine L. Ruva United States 9 105 0.7× 81 0.7× 26 0.3× 84 1.4× 9 0.3× 19 242
Refael Tikochinski Israel 7 85 0.5× 58 0.5× 83 1.0× 40 0.7× 64 2.3× 17 244
Müjde Peker Türkiye 6 81 0.5× 107 1.0× 47 0.6× 46 0.8× 5 0.2× 11 171
Ashwini Ashokkumar United States 6 74 0.5× 83 0.8× 18 0.2× 54 0.9× 12 0.4× 9 157
Alexander Danvers United States 9 100 0.6× 61 0.6× 65 0.8× 43 0.7× 32 1.1× 16 256
Le Vy Phan Germany 6 104 0.7× 45 0.4× 150 1.9× 22 0.4× 38 1.4× 9 238
Christopher L. Groves United States 7 79 0.5× 119 1.1× 42 0.5× 13 0.2× 11 0.4× 14 195
Athena H. Cairo United States 7 128 0.8× 29 0.3× 126 1.6× 16 0.3× 23 0.8× 11 217
David S. March United States 8 67 0.4× 93 0.9× 31 0.4× 84 1.4× 15 0.5× 26 188
Mark Morris United Kingdom 6 58 0.4× 91 0.8× 87 1.1× 38 0.6× 11 0.4× 20 184

Countries citing papers authored by Fade R. Eadeh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fade R. Eadeh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fade R. Eadeh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fade R. Eadeh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fade R. Eadeh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fade R. Eadeh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fade R. Eadeh. The network helps show where Fade R. Eadeh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fade R. Eadeh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fade R. Eadeh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fade R. Eadeh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fade R. Eadeh. Fade R. Eadeh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Eadeh, Fade R. & Alan J. Lambert. (2025). An anger-based framework for understanding terrorism-driven “shifts to the right”: How and why Islamist-focused threats produce narrow changes in political preferences.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 154(7). 1981–2005. 1 indexed citations
2.
Eadeh, Fade R., Thuy Ngoc Nguyen, Pranav Gupta, et al.. (2022). Teaching agents to understand teamwork: Evaluating and predicting collective intelligence as a latent variable via Hidden Markov Models. Computers in Human Behavior. 139. 107524–107524. 10 indexed citations
3.
Adam‐Troian, Jaïs, Éric Bonetto, Elif Çelebi, et al.. (2019). Positive associations between anomia and intentions to engage in political violence: Cross-cultural evidence from four countries.. Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace Psychology. 26(2). 217–223. 18 indexed citations
4.
Eadeh, Fade R. & Katharine Chang. (2019). Can Threat Increase Support for Liberalism? New Insights Into the Relationship Between Threat and Political Attitudes. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 11(1). 88–96. 36 indexed citations
5.
Eadeh, Fade R., Stephanie Allison Peak, & Alan J. Lambert. (2016). The bittersweet taste of revenge: On the negative and positive consequences of retaliation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 68. 27–39. 33 indexed citations
6.
Holtzman, Nicholas S., et al.. (2016). Mind Perception and Individual Differences: A Replication and Extension. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 39(1). 68–73. 17 indexed citations
7.
Lambert, Alan J., et al.. (2014). Toward a greater understanding of the emotional dynamics of the mortality salience manipulation: Revisiting the “affect-free” claim of terror management research.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 106(5). 655–678. 105 indexed citations
8.
Lambert, Alan J., Stephanie Allison Peak, Fade R. Eadeh, & John Paul Schott. (2014). How do you feel now? On the perceptual distortion of extremely recent changes in anger. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 52. 82–95. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026