John Osgood Field

25 papers receiving 229 citations

Peers

John Osgood Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Political Science and International Relations 116
  • Sociology and Political Science 94
  • General Health Professions 75
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 59
  • Economics and Econometrics 35
Replace Wade Pendleton with:
Wade Pendleton Canada
Tom Dyson United Kingdom
Haris Gazdar United States
Robert J. Muscat United States
Ximena Peña Colombia
Ariful Haq Kabir Bangladesh
Beth Schaefer Caniglia United States
Tade Akin Aina Nigeria
Lisa Markowitz United States
John O. Oucho Kenya
John Osgood Field relative to Wade Pendleton Canada Wade Pendleton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Wade Pendleton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Osgood Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Osgood Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Osgood Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Osgood Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Osgood Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Osgood Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Osgood Field. The network helps show where John Osgood Field may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Osgood Field

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Osgood Field. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Osgood Field based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Osgood Field. John Osgood Field is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 8
2
Minding the Generation Gap.
0
3 3
4 0
5
Adult Education and Democratic Citizenship III
4
6
The challenge of famine : recent experience, lessons learned
12
7 4
8
An Environment for Learning.
2
9
Questions about Research That Makes a Difference.
3
10 2
11 55
12 13
13 7
14
Family planning in rural Egypt: a view from the health system.
1
15
Electoral politics in the Indian states : the impact of modernization
1
16 15
17 3
18 3
19 1
20 1

About John Osgood Field

John Osgood Field is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration and Development, having authored 31 papers that have together received 308 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Nutrition and Water Access (4 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (4 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (116 citations), Development (15 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (59 citations). John Osgood Field has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Guatemala. Frequent co-authors include Ronald E. Anderson, Raymond E. Wolfinger, F. James Levinson, Robert C. Mizzi, Robert M. Russell, Myron Weiner, Tonette S. Rocco, Francis Deng, Mal Leicester and Larry Minear. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, Annual Review of Nutrition and Nutrition Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026