John Nachbar
Impact in
-
- Game Theory and Applications
- Auction Theory and Applications
- Safety Research top 5%
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Papers in
-
- Game Theory and Applications 11
-
- Economic theories and models 4
- Game Theory and Voting Systems 2
- Economic Policies and Impacts 2
- Co-authors
- William R. Zame (2 shared papers)Andreu Mas‐Colell (1 shared paper)Bruce C. Petersen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Economic Theory (3 papers)Econometrica (3 papers)Journal of Mathematical Economics (2 papers)Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (2 papers)Social Choice and Welfare (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John Nachbar
17 papers receiving 384 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Management Science and Operations Research 291
- Safety Research 132
- Economics and Econometrics 214
- General Decision Sciences 14
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 31
Countries citing papers authored by John Nachbar
This map shows the geographic impact of John Nachbar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Nachbar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Nachbar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Nachbar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Nachbar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Nachbar. The network helps show where John Nachbar may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside John Nachbar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1990 | 168 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 80 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 27 | |
| 5 | 1992 | 25 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 15 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 15 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 9 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 7 | |
| 12 | Learning in Games. | 2009 | 4 |
| 13 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 14 | Prediction, Optimization, and Rational Learning in Games | 1998 | 2 |
| 15 | The Cost of Capital in the United States and Japan: A Survey of Some Recent Literature | 1990 | 2 |
| 16 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 17 | The Clinical pathology of the blood | 2010 | 1 |
| 18 | 2003 | 1 |
About John Nachbar
John Nachbar is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 18 papers that have together received 430 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Applications (11 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers), Economic theories and models (4 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (3 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (2 papers), Economic Policies and Impacts (2 papers) and Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (291 citations), Safety Research (132 citations), Economics and Econometrics (214 citations), General Decision Sciences (14 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (31 citations). John Nachbar has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William R. Zame, Andreu Mas‐Colell and Bruce C. Petersen. Their work appears in journals such as Economic Theory, Econometrica, Journal of Mathematical Economics, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization and Social Choice and Welfare.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.