Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment
19884.1k citationsSteven M. Fazzari, R. Glenn Hubbard et al.Brookings Papers on Economic Activityprofile →
Financing Innovation and Growth: Cash Flow, External Equity, and the 1990s R&D Boom
20091.2k citationsJames Robert Brown, Steven M. Fazzari et al.The Journal of Financeprofile →
R & D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-Tech Industries
1994930 citationsBruce C. Petersen et al.The Review of Economics and Statisticsprofile →
Is the Growth of Small Firms Constrained by Internal Finance?
2002777 citationsRobert E. Carpenter, Bruce C. PetersenThe Review of Economics and Statisticsprofile →
Capital Market Imperfections, High‐Tech Investment, and New Equity Financing
2002708 citationsRobert E. Carpenter, Bruce C. Petersenprofile →
Working Capital and Fixed Investment: New Evidence on Financing Constraints
1993666 citationsSteven M. Fazzari, Bruce C. Petersenprofile →
Do financing constraints matter for R&D?
2012565 citationsJames Robert Brown, Gustav Martinsson et al.European Economic Reviewprofile →
Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities are Useful: A Comment on Kaplan and Zingales
2000521 citationsSteven M. Fazzari, R. Glenn Hubbard et al.The Quarterly Journal of Economicsprofile →
Cash holdings and R&D smoothing
2010474 citationsJames Robert Brown, Bruce C. Petersenprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Bruce C. Petersen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Bruce C. Petersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bruce C. Petersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bruce C. Petersen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bruce C. Petersen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bruce C. Petersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bruce C. Petersen. The network helps show where Bruce C. Petersen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bruce C. Petersen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bruce C. Petersen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bruce C. Petersen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bruce C. Petersen. Bruce C. Petersen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Brown, James Robert, Gustav Martinsson, & Bruce C. Petersen. (2022). The Growth of Finance is Not Remarkable. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 58(6). 2553–2578.1 indexed citations
Brown, James Robert, Gustav Martinsson, & Bruce C. Petersen. (2013). Law, Stock Markets, and Innovation. The Journal of Finance. 68(4). 1517–1549.16 indexed citations
6.
Brown, James Robert, Gustav Martinsson, & Bruce C. Petersen. (2012). Do financing constraints matter for R&D?. European Economic Review. 56(8). 1512–1529.565 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Brown, James Robert, Gustav Martinsson, & Bruce C. Petersen. (2011). Do Financing Constraints Matter for R&D? New Tests and Evidence *.9 indexed citations
Brown, James Robert, Steven M. Fazzari, & Bruce C. Petersen. (2009). Financing Innovation and Growth: Cash Flow, External Equity, and the 1990s R&D Boom. The Journal of Finance. 64(1). 151–185.1198 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Brown, James Robert, Steven M. Fazzari, & Bruce C. Petersen. (2008). Financing Innovation and Growth: Cash Flow, External Equity and the 1990s R&D Boom.120 indexed citations
11.
Petersen, Bruce C. & Robert E. Carpenter. (2002). Capital Market Imperfections, High-Tech Investment, and New Equity Financing. SSRN Electronic Journal.77 indexed citations
12.
Petersen, Bruce C. & Robert E. Carpenter. (2001). Is the Growth of Small Firms Constrained by Internal Finance. SSRN Electronic Journal.59 indexed citations
13.
Fazzari, Steven M., R. Glenn Hubbard, & Bruce C. Petersen. (2000). Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities are Useful: A Comment on Kaplan and Zingales. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 115(2). 695–705.521 indexed citations breakdown →
Petersen, Bruce C., et al.. (1991). The cyclicality of cash flow and investment in U.S. manufacturing. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 15. 9–19.3 indexed citations
17.
Fazzari, Steven M., R. Glenn Hubbard, & Bruce C. Petersen. (1989). Investment, Financing Decisions, and Tax Policy. American Economic Review. 78(2). 200–205.210 indexed citations
18.
Fazzari, Steven M., R. Glenn Hubbard, Bruce C. Petersen, Alan S. Blinder, & James M. Poterba. (1988). Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1988(1). 141–141.4057 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Petersen, Bruce C.. (1988). Capital market imperfections and investment fluctuations. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 12. 3–12.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.