John M. Allswang

433 citations
36 papers · 178 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

John M. Allswang

28 papers receiving 115 citations

Peers

John M. Allswang
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Marketing 29
  • Political Science and International Relations 66
  • History 27
  • Urban Studies 14
  • Sociology and Political Science 90
Replace Kenneth McNaught with:
Kenneth McNaught Canada
Melvyn Stokes United Kingdom
Damon Freeman United States
Susan Estabrook Kennedy United States
John Tomsich United States
Richard Polenberg United States
Jane H. Pease United States
Gerald W. McFarland United States
William Ivy Hair United States
David L. Chappell United States
John M. Allswang relative to Kenneth McNaught Canada Kenneth McNaught's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kenneth McNaught · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Allswang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Allswang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Allswang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Allswang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Allswang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Allswang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Allswang. The network helps show where John M. Allswang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside John M. Allswang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John M. Allswang Line = papers co-authored together John M. Allswang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197131
2 198721
3 197719
4 197212
5 20018
6 19788
7 19718
8 19887
9 19796
10 19945
11 19825
12 19785
13 19934
14 19964
15 19794
16 19933
17 19713
18 19723
19 19963
20
California Initiatives and Referendums, 1912-1990: A Survey and Guide to Research
19913

About John M. Allswang

John M. Allswang is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Marketing, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and History, having authored 36 papers that have together received 178 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers), American History and Culture (5 papers), Race, History, and American Society (5 papers), Canadian Identity and History (4 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (1 paper), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (1 paper) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (29 citations), Political Science and International Relations (66 citations), History (27 citations), Urban Studies (14 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (90 citations). John M. Allswang has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michaël R. Marrus, Ronald Lawson, Mark Naison, Michael Ebner, Roger W. Lotchin, Robert P. Swierenga, Terrence J. McDonald, Eugene M. Tobin, Bruce M. Stave and Jon C. Teaford. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, The American Historical Review, International Migration Review, American Quarterly and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact