John Locker

777 citations
39 papers · 491 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

John Locker

35 papers receiving 331 citations

Peers

John Locker
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Mathematical Physics 283
  • Numerical Analysis 131
  • Applied Mathematics 212
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 250
  • Algebra and Number Theory 24
Replace Bùi An Tôn with:
Bùi An Tôn Canada
J. Barros-Neto United States
F. Mignot France
P. P. Zabreyko Japan
D. Sather United States
Hans Wallin Sweden
Jerrold Bebernes United States
W. Fulks United States
Zvi Ziegler Israel
Giovanni Prouse Italy
John Locker relative to Bùi An Tôn Canada Bùi An Tôn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Bùi An Tôn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Locker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Locker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Locker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Locker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Locker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Locker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Locker. The network helps show where John Locker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside John Locker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Locker Line = papers co-authored together John Locker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199971
2 198052
3 197343
4 197533
5 199032
6 196723
7 198923
8 197723
9 200821
10
Functional analysis and two-point differential operators
198619
11 197013
12 198812
13 198012
14 198911
15 19889
16 19759
17 19788
18 19927
19 19777
20 19946

About John Locker

John Locker is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, Numerical Analysis and Computational Mechanics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 491 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (15 papers), Differential Equations and Boundary Problems (14 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (13 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (10 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (10 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (9 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (9 papers) and Physics and Engineering Research Articles (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (283 citations), Numerical Analysis (131 citations), Applied Mathematics (212 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (250 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (24 citations). John Locker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Lang, P. M. Prenter, R. Kannan, D. R. Dunninger and Klaus Böhmer. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Journal of Differential Equations, Journal of Functional Analysis and SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact