John Lane

748 total citations
11 papers, 527 citations indexed

About

John Lane is a scholar working on Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, John Lane has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 527 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Education, 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in John Lane's work include Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (3 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (2 papers) and Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (2 papers). John Lane is often cited by papers focused on Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (3 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (2 papers) and Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (2 papers). John Lane collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malta and United States. John Lane's co-authors include Andrew M. Lane, Anna Kyprianou, Ross Hall, Peter Herriot, Serena J. Salloum and Kristen N. Bieda and has published in prestigious journals such as Teaching in Higher Education, Psychological Reports and Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal.

In The Last Decade

John Lane

10 papers receiving 454 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John Lane United Kingdom	6	255	174	118	94	85	11	527
Elaheh Hejazi Iran	12	221 0.9×	194 1.1×	121 1.0×	171 1.8×	134 1.6×	59	587
Anneke Vrugt Netherlands	10	219 0.9×	189 1.1×	177 1.5×	51 0.5×	192 2.3×	20	537
Antonio González Fernández Spain	13	336 1.3×	293 1.7×	130 1.1×	129 1.4×	115 1.4×	64	788
Harry Nejad Australia	4	148 0.6×	229 1.3×	131 1.1×	167 1.8×	64 0.8×	5	462
Anna Kyprianou Cyprus	5	137 0.5×	116 0.7×	68 0.6×	67 0.7×	49 0.6×	9	352
Marianne Miserandino United States	6	185 0.7×	279 1.6×	173 1.5×	75 0.8×	128 1.5×	15	554
Gerard Seegers Netherlands	11	292 1.1×	180 1.0×	228 1.9×	70 0.7×	160 1.9×	22	599
George C. Smith United States	8	111 0.4×	186 1.1×	129 1.1×	63 0.7×	72 0.8×	19	507
Le Xu China	10	255 1.0×	274 1.6×	175 1.5×	149 1.6×	104 1.2×	15	601
Jessica Heppen United States	13	231 0.9×	155 0.9×	94 0.8×	94 1.0×	67 0.8×	32	598

Countries citing papers authored by John Lane

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Lane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Lane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Lane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Lane

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Lane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Lane. The network helps show where John Lane may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Lane

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Lane. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Lane based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Lane. John Lane is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Bieda, Kristen N., et al.. (2020). Issues with, and Insights for, Large-Scale Studies of Classroom Mathematical Instruction. The Journal of classroom interaction. 55(1). 41–63. 1 indexed citations

2.

Lane, Andrew M., Ross Hall, & John Lane. (2004). Self‐efficacy and statistics performance among Sport Studies students. Teaching in Higher Education. 9(4). 435–448. 39 indexed citations

3.

Lane, John, Andrew M. Lane, & Anna Kyprianou. (2004). SELF-EFFICACY, SELF-ESTEEM AND THEIR IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE. Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal. 32(3). 247–256. 299 indexed citations

4.

Lane, John. (2003). Prediction of Postgraduate Performance from Self-Efficacy, Class of Degree and Cognitive Ability Test Scores. Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education. 2(1). 114–119. 9 indexed citations

5.

Lane, John & Andrew M. Lane. (2002). Predictive Validity of Variables Used to Select Students for Postgraduate Management Courses. Psychological Reports. 90(3_suppl). 1239–1247. 2 indexed citations

6.

Lane, John. (2002). PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF VARIABLES USED TO SELECT STUDENTS FOR POSTGRADUATE MANAGEMENT COURSES. Psychological Reports. 90(3). 1239–1239. 2 indexed citations

7.

Lane, John & Andrew M. Lane. (2001). SELF-EFFICACY AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE. Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal. 29(7). 687–693. 142 indexed citations

8.

Lane, John. (2000). A Scientific Approach for Developing and Testing a Students' Job-Career Plan before 11th Grade. 120(4). 605. 4 indexed citations

9.

Lane, John & Peter Herriot. (1990). Self‐ratings, supervisor ratings, positions and performance. Journal of Occupational Psychology. 63(1). 77–88. 24 indexed citations

10.

Lane, John, et al.. (1983). Instructional Problems of Student Teachers: Perceptions of Student Teachers, Supervising Teachers and College Supervisors. Action in Teacher Education. 5(1-2). 71–78. 5 indexed citations

11.

Lane, John. (1982). Autogenic Feedback Training (Body FORTRAN) for Musically Gifted Students at Bonita Vista High School.. 102(3).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact