John J. Ensminger

25 total papers · 436 total citations
19 papers, 301 citations indexed

About

John J. Ensminger is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, John J. Ensminger has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 301 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Genetics, 5 papers in Molecular Biology and 4 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in John J. Ensminger's work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (9 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (5 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers). John J. Ensminger is often cited by papers focused on Human-Animal Interaction Studies (9 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (5 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers). John J. Ensminger collaborates with scholars based in United States, Poland and Canada. John J. Ensminger's co-authors include Tadeusz Jezierski, Aleksandra Górecka-Bruzda, Magdalena Sobczyńska, Marta Walczak, Marta Walczak, Zbigniew Jaworski, Michael McCulloch, Marta Walczak, Mariusz Sacharczuk and David J. H. Cant and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Forensic Science International and Journal of Forensic Sciences.

In The Last Decade

John J. Ensminger

19 papers receiving 294 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
John J. Ensminger	129	96	90	70	53	19	301
Marta Walczak	107 0.8×	76 0.8×	61 0.7×	63 0.9×	178 3.4×	18	366
Michał Dzięcioł	84 0.7×	58 0.6×	39 0.4×	45 0.6×	28 0.5×	28	283
Irit Gazit	163 1.3×	116 1.2×	86 1.0×	71 1.0×	34 0.6×	13	349
Esther Schalke	113 0.9×	51 0.5×	101 1.1×	72 1.0×	27 0.5×	12	255
D. M�ller-Schwarze	35 0.3×	59 0.6×	26 0.3×	42 0.6×	17 0.3×	15	317
Simon Gadbois	48 0.4×	44 0.5×	31 0.3×	43 0.6×	27 0.5×	13	236
Walter Neuhaus	47 0.4×	55 0.6×	51 0.6×	56 0.8×	23 0.4×	19	287
Jaime Figueroa	61 0.5×	22 0.2×	19 0.2×	141 2.0×	19 0.4×	36	317
Paul E. Smith	51 0.4×	58 0.6×	39 0.4×	14 0.2×	61 1.2×	22	304
Céline Lafont‐Lecuelle	167 1.3×	46 0.5×	8 0.1×	163 2.3×	6 0.1×	24	314

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Ensminger

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Ensminger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Ensminger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Ensminger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Ensminger

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Ensminger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Ensminger. The network helps show where John J. Ensminger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John J. Ensminger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John J. Ensminger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John J. Ensminger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John J. Ensminger. John J. Ensminger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact