John J. Bonica
- Physiology top 0.5%
- Surgery top 1%
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 0.1%
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Co-authors
- Ronald MelzackPatrick D. WallPeter U. BergesRichard C. ChapmanT AkamatsuWilliam F. KennedyMichael Stanton‐HicksI. Pilowsky
- Topics
- Anesthesia and Pain Management (57 papers)Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (30 papers)Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (26 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
John J. Bonica
144 papers receiving 6.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
- Physiology 2.4k
- Surgery 2.2k
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 1.7k
- Pharmacology 1.5k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 881
Countries citing papers authored by John J. Bonica
This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Bonica's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Bonica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Bonica more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Bonica
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Bonica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Bonica. The network helps show where John J. Bonica may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John J. Bonica
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John J. Bonica. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John J. Bonica based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John J. Bonica. John J. Bonica is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 39 | |
| 2 | 127 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | Management of superior pulmonary sulcus syndrome (Pancoast Syndrome) | 2 |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | International Symposium on Pain of Advanced Cancer | 18 |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 71 | |
| 9 | Cancer pain: a major national health problem. | 46 |
| 10 | 70 | |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | Proceedings of the First World Congress on Pain | 37 |
| 13 | Recent advances on pain: pathophysiology and clinical aspects | 2 |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | 36 |
About John J. Bonica
John J. Bonica is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience and Surgery, having authored 151 papers that have together received 6.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (57 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (30 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (26 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (1.7k citations), Physiology (2.4k citations) and Pharmacology (1.5k citations). John J. Bonica has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ronald Melzack, Patrick D. Wall, Peter U. Berges, Richard C. Chapman, T Akamatsu, William F. Kennedy, Michael Stanton‐Hicks, I. Pilowsky, Kenichi Morikawa and Richard J. Ward. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Cancer and Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.