Michael Stanton‐Hicks

10.6k total citations · 2 hit papers
94 papers, 5.8k citations indexed

About

Michael Stanton‐Hicks is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Physiology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Stanton‐Hicks has authored 94 papers receiving a total of 5.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 63 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 39 papers in Physiology and 34 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Michael Stanton‐Hicks's work include Pain Management and Treatment (47 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (37 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (32 papers). Michael Stanton‐Hicks is often cited by papers focused on Pain Management and Treatment (47 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (37 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (32 papers). Michael Stanton‐Hicks collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Michael Stanton‐Hicks's co-authors include Stephen Bruehl, Samuel J. Hassenbusch, R. Norman Harden, Peter R. Wilson, Wilfrid Jänig, R Boas, Peter Wilson, J. David Haddox, Marion Good and Bradley S. Galer and has published in prestigious journals such as Pain, Journal of neurosurgery and Anesthesiology.

In The Last Decade

Michael Stanton‐Hicks

93 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Hit Papers

Reflex sympathetic dystrophy: changing concepts and taxonomy 1995 2026 2005 2015 1995 2007 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Stanton‐Hicks United States 36 4.0k 2.9k 2.7k 1.1k 997 94 5.8k
Roberto S.G.M. Perez Netherlands 31 2.5k 0.6× 2.2k 0.8× 1.6k 0.6× 693 0.6× 755 0.8× 104 4.2k
Roman Rolke Germany 35 1.0k 0.3× 1.4k 0.5× 2.5k 0.9× 455 0.4× 376 0.4× 116 4.8k
Frank Huygen Netherlands 46 4.1k 1.0× 3.4k 1.2× 3.3k 1.2× 731 0.7× 1.2k 1.2× 193 6.6k
Sam Eldabe United Kingdom 33 3.4k 0.8× 3.1k 1.1× 1.3k 0.5× 594 0.6× 657 0.7× 137 4.6k
Lone Nikolajsen Denmark 41 3.0k 0.8× 1.7k 0.6× 1.9k 0.7× 3.5k 3.2× 100 0.1× 152 6.6k
F. Boureau France 23 887 0.2× 1.6k 0.6× 2.5k 0.9× 761 0.7× 199 0.2× 87 4.7k
Serge Marchand Canada 51 657 0.2× 2.8k 1.0× 3.0k 1.1× 481 0.4× 460 0.5× 156 6.4k
Peter S. Staats United States 35 2.5k 0.6× 1.3k 0.5× 1.5k 0.6× 1.2k 1.1× 170 0.2× 134 4.4k
Andreas Göebel United Kingdom 28 1.7k 0.4× 1.8k 0.6× 1.5k 0.6× 215 0.2× 625 0.6× 101 3.4k
Bernard Laurent France 22 920 0.2× 1.1k 0.4× 2.3k 0.9× 503 0.5× 152 0.2× 44 4.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Stanton‐Hicks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Stanton‐Hicks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Stanton‐Hicks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Stanton‐Hicks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Stanton‐Hicks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Stanton‐Hicks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Stanton‐Hicks. The network helps show where Michael Stanton‐Hicks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Stanton‐Hicks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Stanton‐Hicks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Stanton‐Hicks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Stanton‐Hicks. Michael Stanton‐Hicks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chapman, Kenneth B., et al.. (2020). Very Low Frequencies Maintain Pain Relief From Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: An Evaluation of Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurostimulation Frequency Tapering. Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface. 24(4). 746–752. 22 indexed citations
2.
Stanton‐Hicks, Michael, Ioannis G. Panourias, Damianos E. Sakas, & Konstantin V. Slavin. (2011). The Future of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation. Progress in neurological surgery. 24. 210–217. 28 indexed citations
3.
McDowell, Gladstone, et al.. (2011). Administering Ziconotide and Monitoring Patients Treated with Ziconotide: Expert Opinions. Pain Management Nursing. 14(3). e84–e94. 5 indexed citations
4.
Rezai, Ali R., Stewart J. Tepper, Charles P. Steiner, et al.. (2010). Electrical Stimulation of Sphenopalatine Ganglion for Acute Treatment of Cluster Headaches. Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 50(7). 1164–1174. 114 indexed citations
5.
Kapural, Leonardo, et al.. (2009). Intrathecal Ziconotide for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Seven Case Reports. Pain Practice. 9(4). 296–303. 22 indexed citations
6.
Rosenow, Joshua M., Michael Stanton‐Hicks, Ali R. Rezai, & Jaimie M. Henderson. (2006). Failure modes of spinal cord stimulation hardware. Journal of Neurosurgery Spine. 5(3). 183–190. 86 indexed citations
7.
Kapural, Leonardo, Salim M. Hayek, Michael Stanton‐Hicks, & Nagy Mekhail. (2004). Decreased Insulin Requirements with Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Patient with Diabetes. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 98(3). 745–746. 10 indexed citations
8.
Stanton‐Hicks, Michael, et al.. (2004). Interventional modalities in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome. Foot and Ankle Clinics. 9(2). 405–417. 3 indexed citations
9.
Mekhail, Nagy, Armin Aeschbach, & Michael Stanton‐Hicks. (2004). Cost Benefit Analysis of Neurostimulation for Chronic Pain. Clinical Journal of Pain. 20(6). 462–468. 62 indexed citations
10.
Stanton‐Hicks, Michael. (2003). Complex regional pain syndrome. Anesthesiology Clinics of North America. 21(4). 733–744. 43 indexed citations
11.
Good, Marion, et al.. (2002). Pain outcomes after intestinal surgery.. PubMed. 5(1). 41–6. 11 indexed citations
12.
Racz, Gabor B. & Michael Stanton‐Hicks. (2002). Lumbar and Thoracic Sympathetic Radiofrequency Lesioning in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Pain Practice. 2(3). 250–256. 15 indexed citations
13.
Good, Marion, et al.. (2000). Pain after gynecologic surgery. Pain Management Nursing. 1(3). 96–104. 18 indexed citations
14.
Stanton‐Hicks, Michael. (2000). Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (Type I, RSD; Type II, Causalgia): Controversies. Clinical Journal of Pain. 16(Supplement). S33–S40. 37 indexed citations
15.
Bruehl, Stephen, et al.. (1999). Complex regional pain syndrome: are the IASP diagnostic criteria valid and sufficiently comprehensive?. Pain. 83(2). 211–219. 257 indexed citations
16.
Stanton‐Hicks, Michael, Ralf Baron, R Boas, et al.. (1998). Complex Regional Pain Syndromes: Guidelines for Therapy. Clinical Journal of Pain. 14(2). 155–166. 238 indexed citations
17.
Hassenbusch, Samuel J., et al.. (1996). Long-term results of peripheral nerve stimulation for reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Journal of neurosurgery. 84(3). 415–423. 157 indexed citations
18.
Hassenbusch, Samuel J., et al.. (1995). Long-term intraspinal infusions of opioids in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 10(7). 527–543. 104 indexed citations
19.
Stanton‐Hicks, Michael. (1990). Pain and the sympathetic nervous system. Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks. 89 indexed citations
20.
Stanton‐Hicks, Michael, A. Höck, Klaus-Dieter Stűhmeier, & J. O. Arndt. (1987). Venoconstrictor Agents Mobilize Blood from Different Sources and Increase Intrathoracic Filling during Epidural Anesthesia in Supine Humans. Anesthesiology. 66(3). 317–322. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026