Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of John Ingram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Ingram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Ingram more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Ingram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Ingram. The network helps show where John Ingram may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Ingram
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Ingram.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Ingram based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Ingram. John Ingram is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Michel, Martin, et al.. (2024). Benefits and challenges of food processing in the context of food systems, value chains and sustainable development goals. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 153. 104703–104703.39 indexed citations breakdown →
Zurek, Monika, John Ingram, Martine Rutten, et al.. (2016). Deliverable 1.1: A Conceptual Framework for Assessing and Devising Policy for Sustainable Food and Nutrition Security in the EU: the SUSFANS conceptual framework. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.2 indexed citations
8.
Chittoori, Bhaskar, et al.. (2016). Recurrent Pavement Damage from Underlying Expansive Soil Deposits - Idaho Experience. Transportation Research Board 95th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board.1 indexed citations
Vermeulen, Sonja, Bruce Campbell, & John Ingram. (2012). Climate Change and Food Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 37(1). 195–222.1507 indexed citations breakdown →
Walker, Brian W., William L. Steffen, Josep G. Canadell, & John Ingram. (1999). The terrestrial Biosphere and global change: implications for natural and managed ecosystems. Synthesis volume..23 indexed citations
16.
Powlson, D. S., et al.. (1997). Managing Soils for Long-Term Productivity: Discussion. 352(1356). 1011–1021.1 indexed citations
17.
Ingram, John. (1997). Food Security in the face of Global Change:the GCTE Rice Network as a framework for international collaborative research. 52(5). 759–768.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.