John Hopton
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Paul HigateVicki CoppockJohn KeadyTommy DickinsonMark PillingSusan EisenbachPeter NolanKhilan Gudka
- Topics
- Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (5 papers)Social Work Education and Practice (5 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomLebanon
In The Last Decade
John Hopton
32 papers receiving 530 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Sociology and Political Science 212
- Gender Studies 198
- Clinical Psychology 169
- General Health Professions 167
- Social Psychology 59
Countries citing papers authored by John Hopton
This map shows the geographic impact of John Hopton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Hopton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Hopton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Hopton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Hopton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Hopton. The network helps show where John Hopton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Hopton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Hopton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Hopton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Hopton. John Hopton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | Keep off the grass: Locking the right path for atomicity | 7 |
| 4 | Mixed Martial Arts and Internet Forums: A case study in treating internet sources as oral history | 2 |
| 5 | The Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities | 293 |
| 6 | Involving users in mental health services | 3 |
| 7 | Our selves and biology | 1 |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | Daily life in a 20th century psychiatric hospital: an oral history of Prestwich Hospital. | 3 |
| 11 | 41 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 41 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | The rights and wrongs of Control and Restraint | 2 |
| 19 | Frantz Fanon Revisited | 1 |
| 20 | 12 |
About John Hopton
John Hopton is a scholar working on Public Administration, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Research and Theory, having authored 33 papers that have together received 592 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (5 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (5 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (198 citations), Research and Theory (12 citations) and Public Administration (37 citations). John Hopton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Lebanon. Frequent co-authors include Paul Higate, Vicki Coppock, John Keady, Tommy Dickinson, Mark Pilling, Susan Eisenbach, Peter Nolan and Khilan Gudka. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Applied Microbiology and Journal of Clinical Nursing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.