John Hellmann

741 total citations
15 papers, 189 citations indexed

About

John Hellmann is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory and History. According to data from OpenAlex, John Hellmann has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 189 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 4 papers in History. Recurrent topics in John Hellmann's work include Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (5 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers) and American Political and Social Dynamics (3 papers). John Hellmann is often cited by papers focused on Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (5 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers) and American Political and Social Dynamics (3 papers). John Hellmann collaborates with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. John Hellmann's co-authors include James W. Gibson, Herbert S. Parmet and William L. O’Neill and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and American Literature.

In The Last Decade

John Hellmann

12 papers receiving 104 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Hellmann United States 8 64 50 48 39 27 15 189
Bruce A. Rosenberg United States 9 49 0.8× 64 1.3× 37 0.8× 22 0.6× 20 0.7× 36 219
Joan DeJean United States 9 31 0.5× 91 1.8× 54 1.1× 30 0.8× 20 0.7× 41 230
Kathleen Ashley United States 7 49 0.8× 57 1.1× 41 0.9× 21 0.5× 12 0.4× 20 199
Laurie Finke United States 8 43 0.7× 57 1.1× 60 1.3× 19 0.5× 15 0.6× 41 199
D. N. DeLuna United Kingdom 3 22 0.3× 60 1.2× 37 0.8× 31 0.8× 26 1.0× 8 159
Louis Montrose United States 10 65 1.0× 147 2.9× 93 1.9× 20 0.5× 27 1.0× 19 316
Neil Forsyth Switzerland 6 49 0.8× 55 1.1× 38 0.8× 37 0.9× 26 1.0× 29 186
David Scott Kastan United Kingdom 7 53 0.8× 144 2.9× 69 1.4× 22 0.6× 28 1.0× 22 288
Michael Neill New Zealand 9 64 1.0× 151 3.0× 63 1.3× 20 0.5× 10 0.4× 39 291
John Plotz United States 7 57 0.9× 102 2.0× 45 0.9× 21 0.5× 17 0.6× 26 202

Countries citing papers authored by John Hellmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Hellmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Hellmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Hellmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Hellmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Hellmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Hellmann. The network helps show where John Hellmann may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Hellmann

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Hellmann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Hellmann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Hellmann. John Hellmann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
2.
Hellmann, John, et al.. (2002). Francis of Assisi, Early Documents. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 40 indexed citations
3.
Hellmann, John, et al.. (2001). Divine and created order in Bonaventure's theology. 13 indexed citations
4.
Hellmann, John. (2001). Cold Warriors: Manliness on Trial in the Rhetoric of the West. American Literature. 73(2). 430–431. 5 indexed citations
5.
Parmet, Herbert S. & John Hellmann. (2000). The Kennedy Obsession: The American Myth of JFK. The American Historical Review. 105(5). 1772–1772. 8 indexed citations
6.
Hellmann, John. (1999). James E. Westheider. Fighting on Two Fronts: African Americans and the Vietnam War. New York: New York University Press. 1997. Pp. x, 238. $24.95. The American Historical Review. 104(2). 602–603. 1 indexed citations
7.
Hellmann, John, et al.. (1996). Fighting and Writing the Vietnam War.. American Literature. 68(2). 493–493. 12 indexed citations
8.
Hellmann, John & James W. Gibson. (1995). Warrior Dreams: Paramilitary Culture in Post-Vietnam America.. The American Historical Review. 100(4). 1332–1332. 17 indexed citations
9.
Hellmann, John, et al.. (1992). Vietnam in American Literature.. American Literature. 64(1). 196–196. 6 indexed citations
10.
Hellmann, John. (1990). JFK: The Author and the Text. American Literary History. 2(4). 743–755. 1 indexed citations
11.
Hellmann, John, et al.. (1987). American Myth and the Legacy of Vietnam.. American Literature. 59(1). 148–148. 43 indexed citations
12.
O’Neill, William L., et al.. (1986). American Myth and the Legacy of Vietnam. Journal of American History. 73(3). 810–810.
13.
Hellmann, John. (1982). Vietnam and the Hollywood Genre Film: Inversions of American Mythology in the Deer Hunter and Apocalypse Now. American Quarterly. 34(4). 418–418. 7 indexed citations
14.
Hellmann, John. (1981). Fables of Fact: The New Journalism as New Fiction. 35 indexed citations
15.
Hellmann, John. (1979). Corporate Fiction, Private Fable, and Hunter S. Thompson'sFear and Loathing: On the Campaign Trail ′72. Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction. 21(1). 16–30.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026