John Goldingay

498 citations
49 papers · 113 indexed · h-index 7
Topics
Biblical Studies and Interpretation (35 papers)Religion, Society, and Development (7 papers)Christian Theology and Mission (6 papers)

In The Last Decade

John Goldingay

28 papers receiving 79 citations

Peers

John Goldingay
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Religious studies 86
  • Sociology and Political Science 53
  • Archeology 25
  • Development 12
  • Philosophy 11
Replace Pieter F. Craffert with:
Pieter F. Craffert South Africa
Stephen Fowl United States
William Robertson Smith
Douglas J. Moo United States
Iain Provan United Kingdom
T. Desmond Alexander United Kingdom
Brian S. Rosner Australia
Richard E. DeMaris United States
Hermann Gunkel
Robert Gnuse United States
John Goldingay relative to Pieter F. Craffert South Africa Pieter F. Craffert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Pieter F. Craffert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Goldingay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Goldingay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Goldingay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Goldingay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Goldingay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Goldingay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Goldingay. The network helps show where John Goldingay may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Goldingay

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Goldingay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Goldingay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Goldingay. John Goldingay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 0
3
Genesis (Baker Commentary on the Old Testament
0
4
Joshua, Judges and Ruth for Everyone
1
5 1
6
Uprooting and planting : essays on Jeremiah for Leslie Allen
6
7 9
8 0
9
The Message of Isaiah 40-55: A Literary-Theological Commentary
8
10
Israel's Gospel
0
11 0
12 6
13 3
14 5
15
How Far Do Readers Make Sense? Interpreting Biblical Narrative
1
16 8
17 3
18 2
19 3
20 0

About John Goldingay

John Goldingay is a scholar working on Religious studies, Development and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 49 papers that have together received 113 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (35 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (7 papers) and Christian Theology and Mission (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (86 citations), Development (12 citations) and Archeology (25 citations). John Goldingay has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David Payne, H. G. M. Williamson, J. A. Emerton and Bill T. Arnold. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Vetus Testamentum and The Jewish Quarterly Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026