John Gásdal Karstensen
- Surgery top 5%
- Oncology top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Peter VilmannJakob HendelSrdan NovovicMikkel Parsberg WergeAmer HadiPia KlausenUlf Gøttrup PedersenLise Lotte Gluud
- Topics
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (35 papers)Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (28 papers)Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (26 papers)
- Cited by
- GastroenterologyOncologySurgery
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaGastroenterologyGut
- Partner nations
- DenmarkItalyNetherlands
In The Last Decade
John Gásdal Karstensen
94 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Surgery 723
- Oncology 471
- Epidemiology 274
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 272
- Genetics 264
Countries citing papers authored by John Gásdal Karstensen
This map shows the geographic impact of John Gásdal Karstensen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Gásdal Karstensen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Gásdal Karstensen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Gásdal Karstensen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Gásdal Karstensen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Gásdal Karstensen. The network helps show where John Gásdal Karstensen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Gásdal Karstensen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Gásdal Karstensen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Gásdal Karstensen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Gásdal Karstensen. John Gásdal Karstensen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About John Gásdal Karstensen
John Gásdal Karstensen is a scholar working on Oncology, Gastroenterology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 108 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (35 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (28 papers) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (26 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (194 citations), Oncology (471 citations) and Surgery (723 citations). John Gásdal Karstensen has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Italy and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Peter Vilmann, Jakob Hendel, Srdan Novovic, Mikkel Parsberg Werge, Amer Hadi, Pia Klausen, Ulf Gøttrup Pedersen, Lise Lotte Gluud, Klaus Tjelle Kristiansen and Bojan Kovacevic. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Gastroenterology and Gut.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.