John Gardner

1.7k citations
43 papers · 1.0k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 16

John Gardner

37 papers receiving 959 citations

Hit Papers

Toward effective government communication strategies in t...274202120262022202450100150200250

Peers

John Gardner
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Communication 95
  • Health Informatics 13
  • Neurology 137
  • Health 73
  • Reproductive Medicine 71
Replace Purnima Singh with:
Purnima Singh India
Shweta Singh India
Ruha Benjamin United States
Shoshana Shiloh Israel
Jeong‐han Kang South Korea
Mary L. Anderson United States
Tiago Moreira United Kingdom
Robert Ho Australia
James A. Rosenthal United States
John Gardner relative to Purnima Singh India Purnima Singh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.9×
Purnima Singh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Gardner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Gardner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Gardner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Gardner. The network helps show where John Gardner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Gardner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Gardner Line = papers co-authored together John Gardner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20240
3 20240
4 20232
5 202211
6
Toward effective government communication strategies in the era of COVID-19breakdown →
2021274
7 20209
8 202012
9 201965
10 201812
11 201818
12 20183
13 201728
14 20176
15 20172
16 201611
17 201616
18 201638
19 20111
20
Collaborating across the sectors: the relationships between the humanities, arts and social sciences (HASS) and science, technology, engineering and medicine (STEM) sectors
20061

About John Gardner

John Gardner is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Neurology, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (7 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (6 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (5 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (5 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (5 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers) and Biomedical and Engineering Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (95 citations), Health Informatics (13 citations), Neurology (137 citations), Health (73 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (71 citations). John Gardner has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Webster, Bernadette Hyland, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Julie Leask, Clare Williams, Gabrielle Samuel, Kerry O’Brien, Adrian Carter, Narelle Warren and Alex Faulkner. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Sociology of Health & Illness, International Journal of Drug Policy, Regenerative Medicine and Clinical Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026