John Gallagher

438 total citations
22 papers, 319 citations indexed

About

John Gallagher is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, John Gallagher has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 319 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Clinical Psychology, 5 papers in Social Psychology and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in John Gallagher's work include Risk and Safety Analysis (4 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers) and Parental Involvement in Education (3 papers). John Gallagher is often cited by papers focused on Risk and Safety Analysis (4 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers) and Parental Involvement in Education (3 papers). John Gallagher collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. John Gallagher's co-authors include Daniel Fekadu, Jason Luty, José B. Ashford, Cynthia E. Hazel, Debra Hagler, Douglas F. Kupas, José G. Cabañas, Jefferson G. Williams, Jane H. Brice and John Gallagher and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications and Psychological Assessment.

In The Last Decade

John Gallagher

21 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Gallagher United States 8 111 111 73 71 64 22 319
Eva Brown Hajdukova United Kingdom 7 85 0.8× 111 1.0× 134 1.8× 43 0.6× 50 0.8× 15 296
Jorge Rodríguez United States 10 125 1.1× 177 1.6× 114 1.6× 52 0.7× 52 0.8× 29 385
Lisa Maguire United Kingdom 12 73 0.7× 110 1.0× 98 1.3× 97 1.4× 34 0.5× 31 415
Karen Fletcher Australia 9 83 0.7× 192 1.7× 102 1.4× 21 0.3× 42 0.7× 14 394
Lourdes R. Guerrero United States 12 97 0.9× 117 1.1× 110 1.5× 64 0.9× 63 1.0× 36 377
Niamh O’Brien United Kingdom 10 69 0.6× 60 0.5× 43 0.6× 87 1.2× 112 1.8× 27 269
Pei Boon Ooi Malaysia 10 86 0.8× 111 1.0× 77 1.1× 45 0.6× 72 1.1× 49 353
Delilah O. Noronha United States 5 88 0.8× 108 1.0× 55 0.8× 14 0.2× 71 1.1× 7 322
Linda Chapman United Kingdom 11 72 0.6× 93 0.8× 119 1.6× 58 0.8× 50 0.8× 29 405
Melissa Johnson United States 8 93 0.8× 56 0.5× 176 2.4× 126 1.8× 58 0.9× 15 383

Countries citing papers authored by John Gallagher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Gallagher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Gallagher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Gallagher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Gallagher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Gallagher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Gallagher. The network helps show where John Gallagher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Gallagher

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Gallagher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Gallagher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Gallagher. John Gallagher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Gallagher, John & José B. Ashford. (2021). Perceptions of legal legitimacy in veterans treatment courts: A test of a modified version of procedural justice theory.. Law and Human Behavior. 45(2). 152–164. 5 indexed citations
3.
Cabañas, José G., Jefferson G. Williams, John Gallagher, & Jane H. Brice. (2020). COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of EMS Physicians in a Community Response Effort. Prehospital Emergency Care. 25(1). 8–15. 14 indexed citations
4.
Gallagher, John & José B. Ashford. (2019). Perceptions of Legal Legitimacy among University Students with and without Military Service. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(2). 137–152. 2 indexed citations
5.
Ashford, José B. & John Gallagher. (2019). Preventing Juvenile Transitions to Adult Crime: A Pilot Study of Probation Interventions for Older, High-Risk Juvenile Delinquents. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 46(8). 1148–1164. 8 indexed citations
6.
Gallagher, John, et al.. (2019). Geriatric Social Work Competency Scale II: Testing the Hypothesized Factor Structure. Journal of Social Work Education. 56(2). 260–272. 2 indexed citations
7.
Gallagher, John, et al.. (2017). Participants’ views on the strengths and limitations of drug court: Recommendations to enhance assessment and treatment of mental illnesses. Social Work in Mental Health. 16(4). 436–450. 7 indexed citations
8.
Gallagher, John, et al.. (2016). A qualitative investigation into military veterans’ experiences in a problem-solving court: Factors that impact graduation rates. Social Work in Mental Health. 15(5). 487–499. 1 indexed citations
9.
Gallagher, John & José B. Ashford. (2016). Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 43(11). 1639–1652. 31 indexed citations
10.
Hazel, Cynthia E., et al.. (2014). Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity of the Student School Engagement Measure.. Psychological Assessment. 26(3). 806–814. 19 indexed citations
11.
Gallagher, John, et al.. (2013). Constructing the foundations for compassionate care: How service-learning affects nursing students' attitudes towards the poor. Nurse Education in Practice. 14(3). 299–303. 43 indexed citations
12.
Hazel, Cynthia E., et al.. (2013). MEASURING ASPIRATIONS, BELONGING, AND PRODUCTIVITY IN SECONDARY STUDENTS: VALIDATION OF THE STUDENT SCHOOL ENGAGEMENT MEASURE. Psychology in the Schools. 50(7). 689–704. 38 indexed citations
13.
Gallagher, John & Douglas F. Kupas. (2012). Experience with an Anonymous Web-Based State EMS Safety Incident Reporting System. Prehospital Emergency Care. 16(1). 36–42. 13 indexed citations
14.
Luty, Jason, et al.. (2006). The professional status of psychiatrists: good but not great. Psychiatric Bulletin. 30(8). 314–314. 2 indexed citations
15.
Luty, Jason, et al.. (2006). Validation of a short instrument to measure stigmatised attitudes towards mental illness. Psychiatric Bulletin. 30(7). 257–260. 111 indexed citations
16.
Gallagher, John, et al.. (1988). Electrical hot work safety program. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. 24(1). 64–69. 7 indexed citations
17.
Roth, Emilie M., David D. Woods, & John Gallagher. (1986). Analysis of Expertise in a Dynamic Control Task. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting. 30(2). 179–181. 3 indexed citations
18.
Gallagher, John, et al.. (1980). Development and enhancement of man-machine interface on operating nuclear power plants. 42. 1 indexed citations
19.
Rajagopal, Vijay & John Gallagher. (1967). Some Applications of Dynamic Measurements in Pressurized Water Reactor Nuclear Power Plants. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 14(2). 15–21. 2 indexed citations
20.
Gallagher, John, et al.. (1965). Radiation Monitoring-An Instrumentation System for Control of Radiation Hazards. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 12(6). 15–21. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026