John G. Knight

940 total citations
20 papers, 644 citations indexed

About

John G. Knight is a scholar working on Plant Science, Marketing and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, John G. Knight has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 644 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Plant Science, 8 papers in Marketing and 4 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in John G. Knight's work include Organic Food and Agriculture (10 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (8 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (7 papers). John G. Knight is often cited by papers focused on Organic Food and Agriculture (10 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (8 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (7 papers). John G. Knight collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, China and Australia. John G. Knight's co-authors include David Holdsworth, Damien Mather, Andrea Insch, Hongxia Zhang, Fang Liu, Jin Sun, Hongzhi Gao, Hongxia Zhang, Lay Peng Tan and Tim Breitbarth and has published in prestigious journals such as Neurology, Journal of Business Research and Journal of International Business Studies.

In The Last Decade

John G. Knight

19 papers receiving 593 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John G. Knight New Zealand	11	291	207	184	104	88	20	644
Wallace M.S. Yee United Kingdom	14	224 0.8×	217 1.0×	209 1.1×	160 1.5×	42 0.5×	18	617
Kåre Skallerud Norway	16	259 0.9×	71 0.3×	278 1.5×	161 1.5×	63 0.7×	24	701
Renee B. Kim South Korea	14	302 1.0×	140 0.7×	151 0.8×	80 0.8×	87 1.0×	61	629
Melissa Moore United States	14	436 1.5×	254 1.2×	308 1.7×	72 0.7×	28 0.3×	24	919
Mikaël Klintman Sweden	15	168 0.6×	186 0.9×	126 0.7×	95 0.9×	162 1.8×	45	601
Anupam Singh India	10	452 1.6×	270 1.3×	110 0.6×	161 1.5×	117 1.3×	23	717
Jane Lu Hsu Taiwan	14	226 0.8×	65 0.3×	135 0.7×	56 0.5×	40 0.5×	44	482
Liz Thach United States	20	349 1.2×	613 3.0×	304 1.7×	539 5.2×	92 1.0×	44	1.4k
Natalia Mæhle Norway	15	461 1.6×	64 0.3×	302 1.6×	74 0.7×	80 0.9×	33	792
Jaeseok Jeong South Korea	9	200 0.7×	44 0.2×	109 0.6×	113 1.1×	88 1.0×	25	466

Countries citing papers authored by John G. Knight

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John G. Knight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John G. Knight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John G. Knight more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John G. Knight

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John G. Knight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John G. Knight. The network helps show where John G. Knight may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John G. Knight

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John G. Knight. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John G. Knight based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John G. Knight. John G. Knight is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Insch, Andrea, et al.. (2015). Managerial Perceptions of Country-of-Origin: An Empirical Study of New Zealand Food Manufacturers. Journal of Food Products Marketing. 22(3). 304–319. 9 indexed citations

Zhang, Hongxia, Jin Sun, Fang Liu, & John G. Knight. (2014). Be rational or be emotional: advertising appeals, service types and consumer responses. European Journal of Marketing. 48(11/12). 2105–2126. 170 indexed citations

Knight, John G., et al.. (2013). Potential damage of GM crops to the country image of the producing country. GM crops & food. 4(3). 151–157. 4 indexed citations

Gao, Hongzhi, John G. Knight, Hongxia Zhang, Damien Mather, & Lay Peng Tan. (2012). Consumer scapegoating during a systemic product-harm crisis. Journal of Marketing Management. 28(11-12). 1270–1290. 42 indexed citations

Knight, John G., et al.. (2011). Damage Control. Journal of Advertising Research. 51(2). 394–403. 4 indexed citations

Mather, Damien, et al.. (2011). Social Stigma and Consumer Benefits. Science Communication. 34(4). 487–519. 35 indexed citations

Insch, Andrea, et al.. (2011). Retail Buyers’ Decision-Making and Buy National Campaigns. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ). 19(4). 257–266. 15 indexed citations

Gao, Hongzhi, John G. Knight, Hongxia Zhang, & Damien Mather. (2011). Guilt by association: Heuristic risks for foreign brands during a product-harm crisis in China. Journal of Business Research. 66(8). 1044–1051. 28 indexed citations

Insch, Andrea, et al.. (2010). Food miles: Do UK consumers actually care?. Food Policy. 35(6). 504–513. 136 indexed citations

10.

Knight, John G. & Hongzhi Gao. (2009). Chinese gatekeeper perceptions of genetically modified food. British Food Journal. 111(1). 56–69. 18 indexed citations

11.

Knight, John G., David Holdsworth, & Damien Mather. (2008). GM food and neophobia: connecting with the gatekeepers of consumer choice. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 88(5). 739–744. 21 indexed citations

12.

Knight, John G., David Holdsworth, & Damien Mather. (2007). Country-of-origin and choice of food imports: an in-depth study of European distribution channel gatekeepers. Journal of International Business Studies. 38(1). 107–125. 95 indexed citations

13.

Knight, John G., David Holdsworth, & Damien Mather. (2005). Selection criteria for country of origin of food imports by European food distributors. Journal of Translational Medicine. 21(1). 799–799.

14.

Knight, John G., Damien Mather, & David Holdsworth. (2005). Consumer benefits and acceptance of genetically modified food. Journal of Public Affairs. 5(3-4). 226–235. 17 indexed citations

15.

Knight, John G., Damien Mather, & David Holdsworth. (2005). Impact of genetic modification on country image of imported food products in European markets: Perceptions of channel members. Food Policy. 30(4). 385–398. 27 indexed citations

16.

Knight, John G., Damien Mather, & David Holdsworth. (2005). Genetically modified crops and country image of food exporting countries. British Food Journal. 107(9). 653–662. 10 indexed citations

17.

Gao, Hongzhi & John G. Knight. (2005). Pioneering advantage and product-country image: evidence from China. Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago). 1 indexed citations

18.

Knight, John G. & Hongzhi Gao. (2005). Country of origin and confidence in quality of imported foods in China. Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago). 1 indexed citations

19.

Knight, John G., Damien Mather, & David Holdsworth. (2005). Acceptance Of Genetically Modified Food With Consumer Benefits. 2 indexed citations

20.

Knight, John G., et al.. (1986). Autoantibodies to acetylcholine receptor in myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 36(11). 1531–1531. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact