John E. Smith

47 papers receiving 486 citations

Peers

John E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • General Psychology 20
  • Philosophy 164
  • History and Philosophy of Science 37
  • Religious studies 23
  • Cell Biology 53
Replace David Perkins with:
David Perkins United States
Robert C. Evans United States
Michael J. Harner United States
R. Steven Turner Canada
Daniel W. Smith United States
André Bretón France
Charlotte Mandell United States
Harry Hoijer United States
Carolyn Korsmeyer United States
Reneé Schwartz United States
John E. Smith relative to David Perkins United States David Perkins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
David Perkins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Smith. The network helps show where John E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside John E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together John E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979106
2
Fungal differentiation. A contemporary synthesis.
198389
3 196975
4 198739
5
Time and Qualitative Time
198636
6 196433
7
A Jonathan Edwards Reader
199525
8 198421
9 200220
10
Experience and God
196819
11 197918
12
America's philosophical vision
199216
13 196913
14
Biosynthesis and metabolism
197610
15 195110
16 196510
17 19859
18 19679
19 20029
20 19858

About John E. Smith

John E. Smith is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Education and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 58 papers that have together received 648 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (12 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (3 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (3 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (20 citations), Philosophy (164 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (37 citations), Religious studies (23 citations) and Cell Biology (53 citations). John E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Pateman, Clark T. Rogerson, Y. H. Krikorian, D. R. Berry, Pamela F. Foley, Harry S. Stout, David M. Goldberg, Jonathan Edwards, Alfred S. Sussman and Bruce W. Hartman. Their work appears in journals such as Religious Studies, The Monist, The Journal of Philosophy, The Journal of Religion and International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact