D. Scott Kreiner
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 1%
- Surgery top 5%
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Jamie BaisdenThomas GilbertJeffrey T. SummersCharles A. ReitmanWilliam O. ShafferRichard C. MendelChristopher M. BonoGary Ghiselli
- Topics
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (11 papers)Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (6 papers)Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew ZealandNetherlands
In The Last Decade
D. Scott Kreiner
13 papers receiving 970 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 873
- Surgery 691
- Pharmacology 617
- Biomedical Engineering 104
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 72
Countries citing papers authored by D. Scott Kreiner
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Scott Kreiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Scott Kreiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Scott Kreiner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. Scott Kreiner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Scott Kreiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Scott Kreiner. The network helps show where D. Scott Kreiner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Scott Kreiner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Scott Kreiner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Scott Kreiner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. Scott Kreiner. D. Scott Kreiner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 85 | |
| 10 | An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update)breakdown → | 324 |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 230 | |
| 13 | 100 | |
| 14 | 158 |
About D. Scott Kreiner
D. Scott Kreiner is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology and Surgery, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (11 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (6 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (873 citations), Pharmacology (617 citations) and Surgery (691 citations). D. Scott Kreiner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jamie Baisden, Thomas Gilbert, Jeffrey T. Summers, Charles A. Reitman, William O. Shaffer, Richard C. Mendel, Christopher M. Bono, Gary Ghiselli, Steven W. Hwang and Robert Fernand. Their work appears in journals such as The Spine Journal, Pain Medicine and Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.