John E. McBride
- Biotechnology top 1%
- Enzyme Production and Characterization 2
- Biomedical Engineering top 1%
- Biofuel production and bioconversion 9
- Catalysis for Biomass Conversion 1
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction 5
- Fungal and yeast genetics research 2
- Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization 2
- Biomaterials top 10%
- Building and Construction top 5%
-
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis 1
-
- Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls 1
- Co-authors
- Lee R. LyndWillem H. van ZylMark LaserDaniel G. OlsonA. Joe ShawRiaan den HaanDaniël C. la GrangeAllan C. Froehlich
- Journals
- Enzyme and Microbial Technology (2 papers)Current Opinion in Biotechnology (2 papers)Biotechnology and Bioengineering (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth AfricaIreland
In The Last Decade
John E. McBride
9 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Biotechnology 443
- Biomedical Engineering 1.7k
- Molecular Biology 1.5k
- Biomaterials 138
- Building and Construction 130
Countries citing papers authored by John E. McBride
This map shows the geographic impact of John E. McBride's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. McBride with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. McBride more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John E. McBride
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. McBride. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. McBride. The network helps show where John E. McBride may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. McBride, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Expression of enzymes in yeast for lignocellulose derived oligomer CBP | 2023 | 0 |
| 2 | 2016 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 119 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 449 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 199 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 81 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 8 | Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an updatebreakdown → | 2005 | 963 |
| 9 | 2005 | 30 | |
| 10 | How Biofuels Can Help End America's Oil Dependence | 2004 | 16 |
About John E. McBride
John E. McBride is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Biomedical Engineering and Pollution, having authored 10 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biofuel production and bioconversion (9 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (5 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (2 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (2 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (2 papers), Catalysis for Biomass Conversion (1 paper), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (1 paper) and Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (443 citations), Biomedical Engineering (1.7k citations) and Molecular Biology (1.5k citations). John E. McBride has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Lee R. Lynd, Willem H. van Zyl, Mark Laser, Daniel G. Olson, A. Joe Shaw, Riaan den Haan, Daniël C. la Grange, Allan C. Froehlich, Anscha J.J. Zietsman and Vineet Rajgarhia. Their work appears in journals such as Enzyme and Microbial Technology, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining and Advances in biochemical engineering, biotechnology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.