John D. Williams
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- John GruzelierDonald W. SparlingBenjamin RahmRodney J. CroftJochen KaiserCorinna HaenschelTorsten BaldewegJohn C. Watson
- Topics
- Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (6 papers)Pain Management and Placebo Effect (5 papers)Optimal Experimental Design Methods (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Applied PsychologyJournal of Marriage and the FamilyJournal of Theoretical Biology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
John D. Williams
66 papers receiving 715 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Cognitive Neuroscience 352
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 121
- Social Psychology 115
- Clinical Psychology 78
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 76
Countries citing papers authored by John D. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of John D. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John D. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John D. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John D. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John D. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John D. Williams. The network helps show where John D. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John D. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John D. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John D. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John D. Williams. John D. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 58 | |
| 6 | 102 | |
| 7 | 44 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | Neural network design: an object oriented approach | 1 |
| 13 | Multiple Comparisons in Higher Dimensional Designs. | 0 |
| 14 | Path Analysis from a Regression Perspective. | 1 |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | A Comparison of Raw Gain Scores, Residual Gain Scores, and the Analysis of Covariance with Two Modes of Teaching Reading. | 5 |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About John D. Williams
John D. Williams is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, General Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 73 papers that have together received 807 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (6 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (5 papers) and Optimal Experimental Design Methods (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (46 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (352 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (121 citations). John D. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include John Gruzelier, Donald W. Sparling, Benjamin Rahm, Rodney J. Croft, Jochen Kaiser, Corinna Haenschel, Torsten Baldeweg, John C. Watson, Gina Rippon and Barbara M. Stone. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Marriage and the Family and Journal of Theoretical Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.