Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Joop Jukema's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joop Jukema with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joop Jukema more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joop Jukema. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joop Jukema. The network helps show where Joop Jukema may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joop Jukema
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joop Jukema.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joop Jukema based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Joop Jukema. Joop Jukema is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jukema, Joop, et al.. (2014). Wing and tail moult of American Golden-Plovers Pluvialis dominica on wintering grounds in Uruguay, with confirmation that juveniles replace all primaries during their first non-breeding season. 118(2). 129–131.1 indexed citations
Jukema, Joop, et al.. (2013). Incomplete and irregular annual replacement of secondaries in Eurasian Golden Plovers, Pluvialis apricaria. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 120(2). 102–107.1 indexed citations
Piersma, Theunis, et al.. (2006). A single-year comparison of two methods of censusing breeding Red Knot and Sanderling in High Arctic Greenland. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 109. 83–87.5 indexed citations
10.
Piersma, Theunis, et al.. (2005). Demography of Eurasian Golden Plovers Pluvialis apricaria staging in The Netherlands, 1949–2000. Ardea. 93(1). 49–64.22 indexed citations
11.
Reneerkens, Jeroen, et al.. (2005). Sex-ratio and body size of sandpiper chicks at Zackenberg, north-east Greenland in 2003. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 106. 12–16.8 indexed citations
12.
Jukema, Joop & Theunis Piersma. (2004). Kleine mannelijke Kemphanen met vrouwelijk broedkleed. 77. 1–10.1 indexed citations
13.
Jukema, Joop & Theunis Piersma. (2004). Kleine mannelijke Kemphanen met vrouwelijk broedkleed: bestaat er een derde voortplantingsstrategie, de faar?. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 77. 1–10.6 indexed citations
14.
Green, Martin A., Theunis Piersma, Joop Jukema, et al.. (2002). Radio-telemetry observations of the first 650 km of the migration of Bar-tailed Godwits Limosa lapponica from the Wadden Sea to the Russian Arctic. Ardea. 90(1). 71–80.23 indexed citations
Jukema, Joop, Eddy Wymenga, & Theunis Piersma. (2001). Opvetten en ruien in de zuidwesthoek: Kemphanen Philomachus pugnax op voorjaarstrek in Friesland. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 74(1). 17–26.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.