John D. Klier

451 citations
31 papers · 159 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

John D. Klier

19 papers receiving 87 citations

Peers

John D. Klier
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Political Science and International Relations 88
  • Demography 35
  • Sociology and Political Science 107
  • Anthropology 13
  • History 12
Replace Abraham Ascher with:
Abraham Ascher United States
Marc Szeftel United States
Peter L. Hahn United States
Roger Hardy France
Theodor Herzl
Jack Jacobs United States
John Lawrence Tone United States
James Harrington United States
Minna Rozen Montenegro
Lucien Jaume France
John D. Klier relative to Abraham Ascher United States Abraham Ascher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Abraham Ascher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John D. Klier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John D. Klier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John D. Klier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John D. Klier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John D. Klier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John D. Klier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John D. Klier. The network helps show where John D. Klier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside John D. Klier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John D. Klier Line = papers co-authored together John D. Klier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199739
2 199333
3 200319
4
Russia Gathers Her Jews: The Origins of the "Jewish Question" in Russia, 1772-1825
20119
5 19978
6
Russians, Jews, and the Pogroms of 1881-1882
20118
7 19867
8
Russia gathers her Jews
19867
9 19835
10 20034
11 19763
12 20012
13 19802
14
The Origins of The Jewish Minority Problem in Russia, 1772-1812
19752
15 19982
16 19911
17 19901
18 20011
19 19771
20 20031

About John D. Klier

John D. Klier is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Demography, Literature and Literary Theory and History, having authored 31 papers that have together received 159 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (22 papers), Jewish Identity and Society (9 papers), Soviet and Russian History (8 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (2 papers), American Jewish Fiction Analysis (2 papers), Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (1 paper), Russia and Soviet political economy (1 paper) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (88 citations), Demography (35 citations), Sociology and Political Science (107 citations), Anthropology (13 citations) and History (12 citations). John D. Klier has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Shaul Stampfer, Patricia Herlihy, Ezra Mendelsohn, Michael Stanislawski, Alvin Z. Rubinstein, Fred Halliday and Josephine Woll. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Russian Review, Journal of Jewish Studies, Slavic Review and Russian History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact