Journal of Jewish Studies

1.5k papers and 3.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Journal of Jewish Studies in the last decades have received a total of 3.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Jewish Studies usually cover Religious studies (758 papers), Archeology (737 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (596 papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (752 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (656 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (343 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Jewish Studies are H. G. M. Williamson, Géza Vermès, Sebastian P. Brock, Martin Goodman, R. J. Zwi Werblowsky, Joshua Schwartz, Lionel Kochan, Philip S. Alexander, Graham Harvey and Hans Liebeschütz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Jewish Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Jewish Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Jewish Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Jewish Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Jewish Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Jewish Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Jewish Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025