John C.S. Tang

28 papers receiving 670 citations

Peers

John C.S. Tang
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Management Science and Operations Research 228
  • Management Information Systems 135
  • Strategy and Management 201
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 109
  • Accounting 114
Replace Carmine Bianchi with:
Carmine Bianchi Italy
Abdel Latef Anouze Qatar
Elvira Haezendonck Belgium
Pei‐Hsuan Tsai Taiwan
Ali Salman Saleh Australia
Darold T. Barnum United States
Heinz Ahn Germany
Che Ruhana Isa Malaysia
Aziz Boussofiane United Kingdom
John C.S. Tang relative to Carmine Bianchi Italy Carmine Bianchi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Carmine Bianchi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John C.S. Tang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C.S. Tang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C.S. Tang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C.S. Tang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C.S. Tang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C.S. Tang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C.S. Tang. The network helps show where John C.S. Tang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside John C.S. Tang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John C.S. Tang Line = papers co-authored together John C.S. Tang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200283
2 200782
3 200671
4 200364
5 201163
6 200843
7 199036
8 201036
9 201035
10 199035
11 199233
12 200624
13 201224
14 200320
15 200919
16 198917
17 199311
18 19988
19 20127
20 19816

About John C.S. Tang

John C.S. Tang is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems, Accounting and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 31 papers that have together received 743 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (6 papers), Global Trade and Competitiveness (5 papers), Global trade and economics (5 papers), Quality and Supply Management (4 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (4 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (3 papers) and Supply Chain and Inventory Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (228 citations), Management Information Systems (135 citations), Strategy and Management (201 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (109 citations) and Accounting (114 citations). John C.S. Tang has collaborated with scholars based in Thailand and China. Frequent co-authors include Donyaprueth Krairit, Do Ba Khang, Sununta Siengthai, P. Karasudhi, Suphat Vongvisessomjai, Ron S. Jarmin, Surapong Chirarattananon and Thierry Léfèvre. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Corporate Governance, Omega and Applied Energy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact